On 22/8/03 9:04 PM, "Rowley Cottingham"
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> On 8/18/03 6:11 AM, "Rowley Cottingham"
>> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Difficult. A lot depends on what you want the staff grade to do, what
>>> THEY are
>>> prepared to do,
>>> and how much you feel they should be awake at night. I have a strong
>>> concern
>>> about
>>> Consultants covering the days and NCCGs the nights developing.
>>>
>>> However, a rule of thumb that seems to work is as follows:
>>>
>>> On the shop floor - 1 session = 1 session.
>>>
>>> On call, likely to come to shop floor 50-100% of time 1 session =
>>> 4hrs.
>>> On call, likely to come to shop floor 25-50% of time 1 session = 6hrs.
>>> On call, likely to come to shop floor under 25% of time 1 session =
>>> 8hrs.
>>>
>>> All other rules about time off after, as per normal.
>>>
>>> This requires diary carding, but is a good compromise that staff
>>> grades etc
>>> can work with.
>>>
>>> Best wishes,
>>>
>>>
>>> Rowley Cottingham
>>>
>>> [log in to unmask]
>>> http://www.emergencyunit.com
>>>
>> This seems a little different from the other proposals where night time
>> working would attract a premium.
>>
>> How is a session defined
>>
>> Mick
>>
>>
> So you work 50% of the time on the shop floor and get paid a session and
> that's not a premium?!
>
> Best wishes,
>
>
> Rowley Cottingham
>
> [log in to unmask]
> http://www.emergencyunit.com
>
I have just come from positions where 100% of time is spent for middle
grades on shop floor .
Your formula would benefit an individual more who does not have to work very
much.
Earlier threads had mentioned premiums for lates/overnights. I was just a
little confused when your suggestion seems to benefit those where they will
have to do the least work
mick
|