Craig & all,
There is evidence about the payment of Spenser's pension. Richard S.
Peterson refers to it in his article on the calling in of Mother Hubberd in
1591. I'm looking now at the TLS piece (May 16, 1997), which doesn't
specify the scholarly source. But Peterson published a longer version on
Spenser Studies that no doubt does. In the TLS piece, he writes, "A study
of thirty years ago traced regular payments by the Exchequer of Spenser's
L50 a year according to the original patent . . . ."
Who wants to bet that A. C. Hamilton has the precise ref. at his fingertips?
David
_____
David Lee Miller
Department of English 543 Boonesboro Ave
University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40508
Lexington, KY 40506-0027 (859) 252-3680
(859) 257-6965
FAX 323-1072
-----Original Message-----
From: Sidney-Spenser Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Craig A. Berry
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 2:16 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: poets rewarded by QE
At 4:40 PM -0400 7/28/03, David Wilson-Okamura wrote:
>
>Chester, Allan Griffith. "Thomas Churchyard's Pension." PMLA 50 (1935):
902.
> there is no reason to suppose that the pension was not paid.
That statement jumped off the screen at me as simply backwards
(though quite likely I'm the one who's backwards, or just ignorant).
It seems to me the thing one would "suppose" would be that the
pension no longer got paid after the first time or two without
vigorous reminders and ongoing influence on and/or access to the
court. My own supposition is colored by being a bit more familiar
with how this worked in the 14th century than in the 16th (e.g.,
Chaucer's "Complaint to His Purse"). Was the Elizabethan office of
accounting and budget so much more efficient than the Ricardian one
that people really did get paid regularly and on time without a lot
of extra begging and reminding?
If the answer to that question is no -- getting a pension paid was
hard work -- then the promise of payment, though significant, would
not by itself carry quite the weight Chester thought it did. If the
answer is yes -- pensioners got paid like clockwork in the late 16th
c. -- then that strikes me as a noteworthy evolution in the
pensioner's relation to power; the initial grant would be more
significant if the likelihood of its continuation was more or less
assured.
--
________________________________________
Craig A. Berry
mailto:[log in to unmask]
"... getting out of a sonnet is much more
difficult than getting in."
Brad Leithauser
|