> From [log in to unmask] Tue Jun 3 12:19 MET 2003
> X-RAL-MFrom: <[log in to unmask]>
> X-RAL-Connect: <[log in to unmask] [130.238.162.227]>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by ori.rl.ac.uk id
> h53AJqS21007
> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 12:19:38 +0200
> From: Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: Encoding scheme URIs
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
>
> _:xxx rdf:type dcterms:LCSH
> _:xxx rdf:value "Psychology"
>
> then I am saying that "the string 'Psychology' belongs to the class of
> LCSH headings". Seems correct.
>
> With this semantics,
>
> dcterms:LCSH dcterms:issued "2000-07-11"
>
> means
>
> "The class of LCSH headings were issued July 11, 2000", which is not
> true at all. Thus, Pete correctly notes that we have a case of
> conflicting semantics here!
There could be many classes, whose class extensions contains things, which have LCSH
headings as literal values by means of the property, RDF denotes with rdf:value.
rs
>
/Mikael
>
> --
> Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
>
>
|