Great I've seen my 1050 patients this year already, can I be excused?.
Duncan
SpR
----- Original Message -----
From: <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: 21 May 2003 18:50
Subject: Re: Help please on staffing
> These formulae were originally worked out for "The way ahead 1998", Paul.
Basically it was felt that "an SHO scheduled for 40 hours of shopfloor work
per week may attend to 3500 patient per annum". After calculating for leave
etc, this amounts to around 2 patients per hour. This was termed a "service
equivalent" or SE.
>
> SHO = 1 SE
> SpR = 0.3 SE
> SG = 0.5 SE (for first post with 1 SE for each additional post)
>
> I hope this is helpful.
>
> Adrian Fogarty (In the sunny metropolis, but I suspect the warm front is
heading our way!)
>
>
>
> > from: "Howarth, Paul - RCHT" <[log in to unmask]>
> > date: Wed, 21 May 2003 10:40:35
> > to: [log in to unmask]
> > subject: Re: Help please on staffing
> >
> > Not strictly academic but I am trying to work out a formula to work out
> > staffing levels, I want to factor in case complexity as the Dumbos who I
> > need to get through to can't see the difference between a bruised toe
and a
> > collapse ? cause.
> >
> > a. Does anyone know of a formula already in existence to save me the
hassle
> > of reinventing one?
> > b. Can anyone remember the formula published by BAEM a few years back,
it
> > differentiated by grade the number of patients that could be expected to
be
> > seen per hour Compared to SHO, if my memory serves me right it was
something
> > like ; Cons = x 0.25, SpR = x 0.5 etc. I think there were also some
actual
> > figures as to how many consultations/ hour was to be expected. I know I
have
> > it on file somewhere, but can I find it......?
> >
> > Thanks and good wishes to you all from a very wet, grey Cornwall
> >
> > Paul
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------
> > The information in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential
> > and is intended for the attention and use of the named
> > addressee(s). It must not be disclosed to any other person
> > without our authority. If you are not the intended recipient, or a
> > person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient or
> > are aware that this e-mail has been sent to you in error, you are
> > not authorised to and must not disclose, copy, distribute, or
> > retain this message or any part of it.
> >
> > We sweep all outgoing messages for the presence of computer
> > viruses. However, we cannot accept any responsibility for any
> > loss or damage to your systems due to viruses or malicious code
> > not detected.
> >
> > The statements and opinions expressed in this message are
> > those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the
> > organisations within the Cornwall & Isles of Scilly Health
> > Community
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
>
|