Hello Amanda
I'd go along with that.
Kindest
Gerald
-----Original Message-----
From: Amanda Poyner <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 08 April 2003 07:18
Subject: Re: Nicks goodbye
>Well said Helen, and please think again Nick. Helen is right, perhaps
>we can have some group process time here, to discuss without some of
>the elements of attack and defence that have been apparent over the
>last postings, and debate with free opinion and difference. It is
>afterall, what makes this list go round.
>
>With Best Wishes and hoping you choose to Stay, Nick.
>Amanda
>
>On Tuesday, April 8, 2003, at 06:30 am, Helen Hannick wrote:
>
>> Dear Nick
>> I joined this group in 1999. Though not a frequent contributor I've
>> found
>> many of the discussions helpful, challenging and thought- provoking.
>> Others
>> I've found less interesting, sometimes irritating and tiresome. Aware
>> of
>> my own bias my reaction has always been to hit the delet button.
>> Possibly
>> it would have been more constructive to openly state my irritation or
>> to
>> have introduced a discussion on issues more relevant to the group's
>> stated
>> aims.
>> With this in mind perhaps it might be useful, before you leave the
>> group
>> (which I urge you not to do), for us all to have an open and
>> respectful discussion
>> about the group aims and contract. Is the group convened to discuss
>> theoretical
>> and research issues in counselling and psychotherapy?
>> Perhaps we can move on from here?
>> Helen
>>> Subject: Goodbye for now
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> After several years, I'm leaving the list. These days there's very
>>> rarely
>>> any discussion I'm interested in, and conversely, several people's
>>> views
>>> appall me. So have fun; and thanks to the people whose mailings have
>>> been
>>> useful and/or enjoyable for me.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Nick
>>
|