Well said Helen, and please think again Nick. Helen is right, perhaps
we can have some group process time here, to discuss without some of
the elements of attack and defence that have been apparent over the
last postings, and debate with free opinion and difference. It is
afterall, what makes this list go round.
With Best Wishes and hoping you choose to Stay, Nick.
Amanda
On Tuesday, April 8, 2003, at 06:30 am, Helen Hannick wrote:
> Dear Nick
> I joined this group in 1999. Though not a frequent contributor I've
> found
> many of the discussions helpful, challenging and thought- provoking.
> Others
> I've found less interesting, sometimes irritating and tiresome. Aware
> of
> my own bias my reaction has always been to hit the delet button.
> Possibly
> it would have been more constructive to openly state my irritation or
> to
> have introduced a discussion on issues more relevant to the group's
> stated
> aims.
> With this in mind perhaps it might be useful, before you leave the
> group
> (which I urge you not to do), for us all to have an open and
> respectful discussion
> about the group aims and contract. Is the group convened to discuss
> theoretical
> and research issues in counselling and psychotherapy?
> Perhaps we can move on from here?
> Helen
>> Subject: Goodbye for now
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>
>>
>>
>> After several years, I'm leaving the list. These days there's very
>> rarely
>> any discussion I'm interested in, and conversely, several people's
>> views
>> appall me. So have fun; and thanks to the people whose mailings have
>> been
>> useful and/or enjoyable for me.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Nick
>
|