hi Nick and list
I haven't been contributing anything lately but I have been sort of
following the discussions that take place. I must admit though that
recently most of the messages from the Psych-Couns list end up in my trash
file. Not so much because opinions expressed here are not worthwhile
reading but mainly because of the fact that they are not relevant to the
reason I chose to become part of this list. There are numerous lists out
there that heated debates take place over anything under the sun. I was
hoping that this list would maintain a focus on the issues related to the
field of counselling and psychology. I don't think that one should go as
far as to unsubscribe from a list that even occasionally (as these days the
case has been) produces something which is quite relevant to ones interests
(as was the case with the evidence based practice guidelines document
yesterday that I didn't know it existed).
Regards
Yannis
Amanda Poyner wrote:
> Well said Helen, and please think again Nick. Helen is right, perhaps
> we can have some group process time here, to discuss without some of
> the elements of attack and defence that have been apparent over the
> last postings, and debate with free opinion and difference. It is
> afterall, what makes this list go round.
>
> With Best Wishes and hoping you choose to Stay, Nick.
> Amanda
>
> On Tuesday, April 8, 2003, at 06:30 am, Helen Hannick wrote:
>
> > Dear Nick
> > I joined this group in 1999. Though not a frequent contributor I've
> > found
> > many of the discussions helpful, challenging and thought- provoking.
> > Others
> > I've found less interesting, sometimes irritating and tiresome. Aware
> > of
> > my own bias my reaction has always been to hit the delet button.
> > Possibly
> > it would have been more constructive to openly state my irritation or
> > to
> > have introduced a discussion on issues more relevant to the group's
> > stated
> > aims.
> > With this in mind perhaps it might be useful, before you leave the
> > group
> > (which I urge you not to do), for us all to have an open and
> > respectful discussion
> > about the group aims and contract. Is the group convened to discuss
> > theoretical
> > and research issues in counselling and psychotherapy?
> > Perhaps we can move on from here?
> > Helen
> >> Subject: Goodbye for now
> >> To: [log in to unmask]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> After several years, I'm leaving the list. These days there's very
> >> rarely
> >> any discussion I'm interested in, and conversely, several people's
> >> views
> >> appall me. So have fun; and thanks to the people whose mailings have
> >> been
> >> useful and/or enjoyable for me.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Nick
> >
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses by
> the DIT Computer Centre MailScanner Service,
> and is believed to be clean.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses by
the DIT Computer Centre MailScanner Service,
and is believed to be clean.
|