> From [log in to unmask] Wed Mar 5 11:38 MET 2003
> X-RAL-MFrom: <[log in to unmask]>
> X-RAL-Connect: <mk-smarthost-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.114.37]>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 10:36:14 +0000
> From: Aida Slavic <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: dc and external authority data
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
>
> This solution in dc:subject is equivalent as if someone would do the following
> in dc:creator :
>
> <dc:creator scheme="system_written_on_paper_accessable_on_demand">17LC33</dc:creator>
as in?
>
> I allow that it is necessary to declare 'encoding schemes', but I still
> think something is missing here...not in terms of what DCMES, being a standard,
> itself needs to solve, but in terms what it ought to allow and anticipate.
>
> One needs to declare rules/KOS and to have real encoding schemes that are
> instantiation of these rules that may be dealt with as permanent namespaces.
Think i understand your concern -
>
> If there is an intention to share KOS tools it may not be enough to say
> scheme="DDC" but may be needed to say that this is scheme="DDC_XY", and
> have the possibility to deal with this as a namespace with each indexing
> term having URN.
Think i understand your concern -
rs
>
> Aida
>
>
|