Sandy,
I do agree with your process suggestion. The process should involve
individuals that are willing to spend time in advancing the AP or ...
and also some others that will be willing to review it. We should
cultivate reviewers since they will always bring a "fresh" perspective
upon this endeavor. I'd propose that we set a date for the "call for
volunteers" and then proceed as you suggest. This will give time for
everyone to ponder how they would like to be involved if at all.
In the end, whatever the group comes up with, the list should consent to
if we ever want it to have some semblance of generality. This will give
everyone the opportunity to have his/her points covered.
Igor
-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 4:23 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: DC corporate application profile project team
Hello,
We might be interested as well. I have certain enjoyed the
conversation that has continued over these items. At DaimlerChrysler we
are also challenged with numerous areas that need standards in taxonomy
and nomenclature. In addition we are a global company which adds to the
complexity. I would like to have us to be considered as well. Thanks!
Sandra F Hostetter
<SHostetter@ROHMHA To:
[log in to unmask]
AS.COM> cc:
Sent by: DCMI Subject: DC corporate
application profile project team
Corporate
Implementation
Interest Group
<DC-CORPORATE@JISC
MAIL.AC.UK>
03/14/2003 09:16
AM
Please respond to
Sandra F Hostetter
So far Nancy Linwood, Igor Perisic, and Lisa Chan have expressed
interest in doing some work on a corporate application profile. Is
there anyone else? If not, then I have a process kind of question - I
imagine it would make more sense if the small group interacted outside
of this list and posted periodic updates or questions to the larger
list?
Sandy Hostetter
Rohm and Haas Company
[log in to unmask]
215-619-5492
the opinions expressed are my own and do not represent those of the Rohm
and Haas Company
|
