> This is incorrect and, to my knowledge, has already been
> identified as needing to be fixed.
Yes, I sent in a comment on the point raised by Jon:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002OctDec/0166.htm
l
and received an acknowledgement that it would be fixed:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002OctDec/0167.htm
l
so I'm sure it's in hand.
Pete
|