JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM  January 2003

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM January 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Zapatistas Renew Uprising

From:

David Wood <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

David Wood <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 10 Jan 2003 16:25:58 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (227 lines)

Zapatistas Renew Struggle with Anger and Fire.
9th Anniversary of Armed Uprising Marked by Biggest Mobilization So Far.

by Ramor Ryan
San Cristobal de las Casas, January 1 2003.
http://slash.autonomedia.org/article.pl?sid=03/01/09/1544248

Defying their critics who charge they are divided and disintegrating, the
Zapatistas mobilised their forces today, mustering the largest and most
militant demonstration seen in San Cristobal since the armed uprising 9
years ago. As many as 20,000 masked militants of the EZLN descended on the
town from all corners of Chiapas armed with machetes and lighting huge
bonfires around the central plaza and surrounding streets. There were no
injuries, and little damage to property, but the feisty rebels demonstrated
in no uncertain terms that, on the 9th anniversary of the uprising they are
still organised, still militant and still enraged.

 A Night To Remember

"I am very proud we have peace in Mexico, with Marcos, with the Zapatistas,"
said Mexican President Vincente Fox a few weeks ago, while visiting Europe.

"Fox says we have peace in Chiapas, that there is no conflict," said
Comandante David from the podium. "Is the conflict settled in Chiapas?" he
asked.

"NOOOO!" was the emphatic reply from the multitude, banging their machetes
and sticks, holding up burning torches, as the black smoke from the multiple
bonfires engulfed the town centre. The masked insurgents packed the
expansive centre plaza and still thousands more were left chanting in the
surround streets. The mood was combatitive and the chants, banners and
speeches from the stage were uncompromising - Fox Is The Same As Zedillo,
PAN Equals PRI, No Evictions From Montes Azules, Globalize Rebellion And
Dignity! The rebellion in Argentina was lauded, and terrorism of Bush and
Bin Laden condemned. "We came to say that here we are still, stronger than
ever and we resist," said Comandante Mister. "Before a globalization of
death imposed by the powerful, we proclaim a globalization of freedom..."

"Are we here to surrender?!" shouted Commandante Tacho, and the crowd
responded with such a hell-raising clamor that a lady next to me was
prompted to mutter

Betrayal and Oblivion
This is the first public mass mobilization of the Zapatista Comandancia and
rank-and-file in almost 2 years. The last Zapatista event was the hugely
popular Caravan to the Capital in February of 2001, bringing out Mexicans in
their hundreds of thousands in support of Indigenous demands, as
Sub-Comandante Marcos and the EZLN command journeyed up to Mexico City..

The crowning achievement of that odyssey was presenting an Indigenous Law
granting a form of autonomy for ratification through Congress. But as soon
as the Zapatistas turned their backs and returned home to Chiapas, that Law
was modified and watered down by government legislators, amidst charges of
betrayal. Appeals to re-instate the original the Law before the Supreme
Court were rejected.

With this constitutional rejection of Indigenous Reform, Congress, the
Federal government and the Supreme Court of the nation was seen to negate
the legitimacy of the San Andres Accords, signed between government and
rebels in 1996. Recognition of the San Andres Accords is the principle
demand in order to re-start dialogue between the EZLN and the Federal
government. With this failure it seemed the legal and political means to
resolve the Chiapas conflict had been exhausted.

The Zapatistas seemed exhausted too, and lapsed into a long piercing silence
lasting 20 months. The Fox Government worked hard to provoke divisions
within the base communities, offering numerous financial incentives. The
Mexican army remained, if a little less visible, encircling the Zapatistas
areas, and paramilitaries upped the ante, murdering 4 Zapatista leaders in
August, 2002. The EZLN did not respond to these provocations, remaining
silent throughout the wave of killings, prompting rumours of their impotence
and inner-turmoil. Marcos has fallen out with the Clandestine Committee, ran
the rumour mongering and has been sent into exile. Rank and file are
deserting the ranks in floods. President Fox , ever the opportunist,
attempted a public relations coup amidst the silence, claiming the conflict
had been resolved.

"We have brought peace to Chiapas," he boasted.

A peace of military occupation, continuing extreme poverty and slow death by
strangulation of the land. The peace of oblivion?

A Spectre Haunts Chiapas.
Chiapas is on the brink of profound structural change, a change that will
not be wrought by a triumphant Zapatista return, but by a series of
mega-projects financed by global capital called Plan Puebla Panama (PPP).
Envisaging a series of colossal dams, construction of super-highways and the
development of a vast sweat-shop area, the planners intend to develop
southern Mexico and Central America into a manufacturing hub and production
corridor. "The Plan Puebla Panama is a thousand times more important than
any indigenous Zapatista community" according to President Fox.

Plan Puebla Panama has three goals -
a) increase the transit and industrial infrastructure of the region,
improving the capacity for export industries,
b) catalyze a shift of the regions economy from agriculture to assembly
plant maquiladoras and manufacturing, and
c) expand private control over the vast natural resources in the region.

The process is already underway. The first sweat-shop has opened in Huixtla.
Road construction is currently a boom industry. Land ownership is changing -
11% of land in Chiapas is held communally (in Ejidos) and most of the ejidos
are in the strategically important Jungle region under control of the
Zapatistas. A government programme Procede offers incentives to communities
to divide their land and individualize holdings. Once it is privatized, the
land can be sold on to investors, or agents for foreign companies, thereby
opening up the process of capitalist development.

The battle between bio-prospectors and the indigenous inhabitants of the
jungle region has already intensified. Bio-piracy, i.e. patenting plants
that can be turned into pharmaceutical drugs, pesticides or other marketable
products, has become highly profitable - prompting the title Green Gold, and
the current rush to patent rights the Bio-gold rush.

Influenced by the Zapatista struggle, communities of small farmers are
organising across southern Mexico and all the way down Central America,
forming international coalitions and coordinating their protests like the
Day of Action last October 12 (Colombus Day) against the PPP and capitalist
globalization. A masked protester from the Regional Co-ordination of Civil
Society organisation, blocking a highway in Chiapas last October articulated
their demands, linking them with those of the Zapatistas.

"We have seen that all Fox and Salazar ( State Governor of Chiapas) have
done is for the benefit of the rich and in favour of the owners of money,...
with little benefit for us, the farmers. We are against the PPP, NAFTA and
ALCA, and as you can see from the banners, in favour of honouring the San
Andres Accords."

In all Mexico about a quarter of the population, 25 million, live off the
land, and 80% of them in extreme poverty. Approximately 600 campesinos are
forced to abandon the land for the cities every single day. The agriculture
sector is in severe decline, and NAFTA is one of the chief reasons. The
influx of cheap corn and wheat from the giant commercial farms of the US is
driving small farmers to ruin.

And rather than promote a sustainable agriculture sector, the Fox
government, firmly committed to NAFTA, and ALCA (Free Trade Agreement of the
Americas) , encourages the desertion of the land. Migration is rife.
Official figures quote 150,000 migrants from Chiapas to the US each year,
but the growth industry in Bus Companies running to the US border - 80 new
companies registered in the last 3 years, suggest an even greater number.
Alongside the internal migration to work in Cancun and the oil fields of
Tabasco, a whole way of rural life and indigenous culture is in danger of
disappearing.

"The PPP will respect the territorial integrity of the communities and
promote a sustainable development" says Fox, which flies in the face of the
events on the ground. 30 indigenous communities on Montes Azules in the
Lacandon Jungle are currently facing violent eviction. This local struggle
has become the front line for wide-spread resistance against the Plan Puebla
Panama. The Zapatistas have sworn to fight eviction in Montes Azules to the
death.

"This traitorous government and the voracious capitalists know that this
land are ours, and we wont abandon it," says Rosa, a fiery Zapatista Chol
from Tumbala, "and its wealth belongs to those who have lived here and
worked these lands for centuries. We resist their globalisation in the same
way the indigenous people resisted the Conquest, and our corn will resist
their transgenic corn!"

The Ninth Anniversary.
The 9 years of struggle of the Zapatistas has, on the ground, been both
advantageous and circuitous. The initial armed uprising opened up vast
swathes of occupied land taken from the finqueros. Thousands of campesinos
continue to occupy and work these territories, a de-facto rebel zone under
the authority of the 38 Autonomous Municipalities. This is the one great
achievement for the bases of support of the Zapatistas. On the other hand,
the autonomous zones are constantly under threat, surrounded by the army and
menaced upon by paramilitaries.

The governments attempts to buy off the rebel communities has been
successful in some areas, and traditional pre-1994 Zapatista strongholds are
often focus for the most persistent counter-insurgency programmes. The
historical Zapatista village of Morelia, for example, has seen the level of
support for the insurgents fall to below 50% of the populace. Support in
another Aguascalientes, Roberto Barrios has fallen to less than 25%.
However, the younger communities on occupied land remain staunch, and
Zapatista numbers swell as children of the rebellion grow up and form their
own communities.

"We are united here," says Don Anselmo of the 100% Zapatista village 10 de
Abril, "although I do worry about some of the other communities..". 5 or 6
of the surrounding smaller villages have dropped out of the struggle.
Ex-Zapatista Esteban explains why he dropped out and left 10 de Abril to
live in one of the other non-Zapatista villages - "I got tired, and I needed
to feed my kids. The (Zapatista) Organisation takes up a lot of time and you
get little in return." Taking advantage of a government scheme, he received
some construction materials and his children receive state schooling. (It's
true, the Autonomous school in 10 de Abril was not functioning well.) Is he
finished with the Zapatistas? "No," says Esteban, "I'm taking a rest".

Renewal of Struggle
And this is the importance of the strong, militant demonstration on Jan 1.
As rumours of significant desertion of the ranks, internal division and
impotency abound, such a powerful manifestation of hardcore allegiance
rallies the troops and demonstrates that the Zapatistas are still the only
show in town. As the constitutional path - marked by betrayal, seems
exhausted and the enemy takes a more global face, the Zapatistas appear to
be changing their tactical direction, renewing the spirit of resistance and
pursuing a more confrontational strategy.

Midnight, January 1, 2003, the night sky above San Cristobal is thick with
pungent smoke and the old colonial streets are jam-packed with hordes of
spirited masked Zapatistas, taking control of the town deserted of locals,
and security forces. As Chiapas faces an uncertain future regarding the Plan
Puebla Panama, one thing is sure from this insurgent demonstration - the
conflict has entered into a new phase. The Zapatistas have returned from
their forays into national Constitutional reform to once more address the
needs and demands of their base constituency. From the stage, Comandante
Bruce Lee (no, really) commanded the cadre to build bigger bonfires to warm
the cool night air.

"This struggle has hardly begun. Let the fires shine bright so that the
people can see how we have maintained our rebellion! ".


The Zapatistas, the Montes Azules Comprehensive Biosphere Reserve (REBIMA)
and the Lacando'n
http://struggle.ws/mexico/biosphere.html

Zapatista autonomous council's
http://struggle.ws/mexico/councils.html


Diez de Abril
http://struggle.ws/mexico/diez.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager