Two things: 1. the html version seems to be missing the last two images.
2. Is this version really January 2001?
Chet Creider wrote:
>Comments later (except that I agree that the diagrams are not as good as
>in the previous version, even the previous html version -- why should
>this be so?),
>
No idea. Eventually, I guess the best thing to do would be to pdflatex
the encyclopedia. It would look beautful and no need for zip compression.
It would be a bit of an undertaking, though. Dick, in a few months,
hopefully I'll have some free time on my hands, so maybe I'll give
it a try then.
>Does anyone know if
>there is an updated command-line decompression program that will handle
>the new longer file names? Winzip is not very easy to use for old-timers.
>
>
I hate Winzip. XP has zip built into the OS. Try the following
link:
http://www.pkware.com/products/free_eval.html
Joe
|