Thanks Arthur,
I'll talk to myself for hours if I'm allowed to.
The second stanza wasn't a patch on the first though.
Roger.
----- Original Message -----
From: "arthur seeley" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: It( Roger)
> I find this little debate you are having with yourself fascinating. *
> smiles* I think the poem itself was witty and well worked through. Thanks
> Arthur
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roger Collett" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 6:32 PM
> Subject: Re: It
>
>
> > I should of course have said that it is the class of possessive pronouns
> > that don't have apostrophes, before anyone leaps in.(his, hers, its,
> theirs,
> > ours, yours.........)
> >
> > Roger
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Roger Collett" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 6:00 PM
> > Subject: Re: It
> >
> >
> > > Yes, isn't English awful considering all other possessives take the
> > > apostrophe.(I think)
> > >
> > > Roger
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Ryfkah *" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 5:49 PM
> > > Subject: Re: It
> > >
> > >
> > > > Ha! What plethora of words.
> > > >
> > > > kol tuv, Ryfkah
|