Unfortunately, the poem slipped to the "works"; it was not intended to
be here. I agree with you; as also with Ryf.
c s shah
arthur seeley wrote:
>
> Morning Shah. This is not one of your better pieces. The form is slack, the
> syntax so nebulous that the meaning is dispersed. It reads almost like a
> sketch for a poem. It needs a rethink and a rewrite I think. Regards Arthur....
|