Then I apologise although it did seem pertinent to the discussion. Arthur.
Glad the analysis helped. Did you agree??
----- Original Message -----
From: "c s shah" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: Value Erosion
> > I sense this is a subtle response to some of my remarks
> > about poetry being an act of communication and its value lying there.
> > ...
>
> No Arthur, nothing of the sort;
> in fact the poem was written about one year back.
>
> >It is perhaps valid to argue that a poem exists in three possible states.
>
> Thanks for the analysis, I appreciate it.
>
> c s s
|