JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC Archives

POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC  2003

POETRYETC 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Homophobia

From:

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Poetryetc provides a venue for a dialogue relating to poetry and poetics <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 4 May 2003 14:41:13 +1000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (125 lines)

On Sat, 2003-05-03 at 09:28, Alison Croggon wrote:

> This is I guess a variation of the artist being "inspired" (and I
> recall we talked about childbirth and raising being also
> "unproductive labour").  Although there is a certain accuracy in
> Marx's attitude, in that only Milton could have written Milton's
> poems, I have the same problems with Paradise Lost being classified
> as unproductive labour, although no doubt perversely I totally resent
> being classified as a small business (a "lone trader") under
> Australian tax law.  It elides something crucial about this kind of
> work (making poems or making children) as a human activity, lifting
> it apart from proper or productive labour.  The old question, when
> are you going to get a proper job? and so on.
>
> Best
>
> A
> --

Alison, I am a bit worried about this reading or direction. But first, a
difficulty wrt Marx needs to be cleared out of the way. Marx has a
radically hands off approach to creative artists, which I support.
Revolutionary marxists have no right to tell creative writers what they
can and cannot write and then to lock them up or shoot them if they do
not comply with this demand. Unfortunately Marx's name is attached to
something called Socialist Realism, as argued by the Stalinist communist
parties. So in talking about Marxist politics, I feel a need to make it
clear that I am in no way being prescriptive. I have had differences and
fights with the Australian and European communist parties, which I don't
consider to be revolutionary Marxist parties but Stalinist reformist,
over this question of Socialist Realism which seeks to direct writers in
what they can and cannot write with The Party being the judge of this.
These Stalinists would respond, and have claimed, I am not a marxist and
call me an anarchist. In the end, anarchists and marxists want the same
thing. A society without class exploitation or any form of
discrimination or oppression. We disagree over strategy and class
analysis. But rather be called an anarchist then a supporter of
Stalinism, any day. Rather be a road sweeper then a judge. Too much
writing is concerned with judgment, including Socialist Realism. Rather
be a marxist modernist road sweeper then a Neo-Hegelian Socialist
Realist judge.

The concern I have is to say unproductive labour elides from productive
labour implies all labour should be elided into productive labour. This
is precisely the tendency and direction that capitalist production and
expanding markets seek. The industrialisation of the arts and university
education and research is an example of this historical movement. To
expand markets is essential to capitalist production which means turning
everything it can into commodity production. To be concerned about the
notion of unproductive work in such a way as to say it should be
productive is to express a protestant work ethic which is a type of
Weberian ideology which supports and encourages the exploitation of
workers and seeks to expand and maintain this exploitation. And along
with this comes all the other forms of oppression which function to
maintain this exploitation. It becomes a pro-capitalist argument which
then demands and binds oneself into a politics of compromise, which when
you keep following the argument, becomes one of support for the war in
Iraq and Pax Americana, even if this is a compromised support expressed
as opposition. (Since expanding capitalist markets are essential to
capitalism.)

A good example is the war on drugs as capitalist expansion of markets.
Taking an example, just to illustrate: say I am a well off advertising
executive living in the USA who already has three television sets and
other electrical goods produced by Sony and don't need anymore. This
limits the market in these goods. But I would like some cocaine, so I
buy it on the blackmarket. As a result, my excess income goes to small
drug dealers who can then make income not otherwise available to them,
that passes on to the larger suppliers, on to the money laundering
providers and so forth. All this extra money can then be used to buy not
just one but along the chain six, a dozen and more televisions sets and
by continuing to keep the blackmarket going, more electrical goods, CDs
and so forth. Sony, as a large capitalist corporation then manages to
sell all these extra products and to expand their market in this way.
For this to happen cocaine must be illegal, but not so sufficiently
policed as to wipe the illegal drug market out. The illegal drug market
is the second largest market in the world, all to the benefit of the
expanding so-called legal capitalist market. Along with this comes not
only an expanded capitalist market but discrimination against drug users
as addicts, as was very well demonstrated by contributions to the thread
on alcohol on this list. This is called userphobia which links to racism
and homophobia and which also scapegoats women as poor mothers if they
use drugs, yet the market also requires they use drugs. A whole raft of
discrimination, exploitation and oppression comes with capitalist market
expansion. Also, about 80 percent of the profits from cocaine remain
within the USA and only 20 percent goes to the South American
distributors and producers. Cocaine is also used as an excuse for US
military intervention in South America and to remove indigenous peoples
from their land, which again acts to expand capitalist markets. It
doesn't harm the cocaine trade but merely displaces it and makes sure
the price of cocaine does not become too cheap which would threaten the
market expansion of corporations like Sony.

Marx's analysis of capitalism is more pertinent today, during late
capitalism, then it was in the 19th century when he wrote Capital. It is
interesting that the three theorists most associated with Modernism,
Freud, Nietzsche and Marx, are often the most misunderstood. Perhaps I
am coming to better understand what deLanda was saying: we are not yet
Modernist.

Finally, be careful with placing Marx's silkworm example next to
childbearing. It could elide into saying childbearing is woman's nature,
which then elides into Aristotle's Flower Pot theory of
(Hetero)Sexuality. (I am not saying you are doing this... more be
careful with the argument.) To say childbearing should be considered
productive work in Marx's terms elides precisely into this Aristotlian
argument. Although it has been some time since I have read Irriguay
there is an underlying assumption that there is an essential natural
woman to be found in her writing. I also disagree with her strategy of
jamming the mechanisms, which in the end is ineffective. I tend more to
socialist and materialist feminists, including Donna Harraway, then the
sort of idealisms Irriguay gets caught up in which fold back onto and
end up supporting oppression and exploitation. Biology becomes woman's
destiny in this approach, confining women to childbearing, perhaps like
the Hand Maiden's tale.

I am not sure about Milton being a silkworm as being an inspired artist
which buys into Kant's concept of the creative artist as genius. Marx is
very critical of this notion of genius which appears again in Hegel. But
then I have to wait for the books to chase this up.

Best wishes

Chris Jones.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager