dave:
> I haven't much of
> an opinion of Tony Harrison's stuff either, to throw a male name so no
> misunderstanding ensues.
Disagree. I (if one is allowed to say this) don't have much time for Tony
Harrison as a human bean -- based, I should say, mostly on hearing two of
his readings in close succession, where the asides were (it seemed)
scripted.
But I think he's a bloody marvellous poet, especially in _Continuous_ and --
what the hell was the other book called?
The work he was doing there would fit neatly into Randolph's Language
project.
Cheers,
Robin
|