I find this discussion very interesting and Rebecca has pointed out specific
fundimental flaws in this work (bravo, well done indeed). I commend her for
her time and effort ... brilliant. But why has Tom not responded to this? I
am one of those poets who is aware of what the psych community is up to but
choose to read ______ journals becasue they are accurate reports of poetry.
Tom, tell your friend that I view these papers as kindly work to keep one
employeed as a faculty member; however, when they have it right we'll come
to see what they have.
Geoffrey
----- Original Message -----
From: "tom bell" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2003 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: Poetry & Psych
> I think perhaps the idea is that computers are one way of analysing verbal
> material and parsing is another. But we seem to have gotten sidetracked
> from the original rquest for information about poetry and psychology? Are
> there other sources of information on the question?
>
> tom bell
|