JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC Archives

POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC  2003

POETRYETC 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Skivvy

From:

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Poetryetc provides a venue for a dialogue relating to poetry and poetics <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:34:34 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (113 lines)

Where vwould you put Wuthering Heights?


At 11:52 AM 1/12/2003 +0000, you wrote:
>Alison's mention of the novel here is very apt, as, I think, there are more
>clear examples of both successful and failed imaginative explorations of the
>Other in that genre than in poetry, SuperPoet from the Planet Stratford
>excepted (wink).
>
>Maybe Euripides too but let's be wary of Greeks for the moment.
>
>I am thinking here of whole catalogue of examples, just to mention a few:
>Conrad was almost incapable of portraying a female character without
>sentimentalisation, vide Nostromo, and Mrs Gould, with the singular
>exception of Verloc's wife in The Secret Agent, which character I have
>always had the suspicion ( a horrible one) is based on Conrad's own wife;
>George Eliot could certainly portray male characters convincingly, except
>when romantic interest was involved, then something would go oddly wrong,
>her portrayals of supposedly male preserves like bar-rooms and horse-fairs
>were also much more convincing than most male novelists of the time; James
>Joyce The Prurient managed, despite his foibles, to give voice to women's
>experience better than almost any novelist of the last century in the
>Nausicca episode and of course Molly Bloom's soliloquy; while in Jane Austen
>although the portrayals of males are limited by the bounds of the writer's
>concerns within those limitations they are convincing, so the walking
>marriage propositions and wise uncle-likes do succeed artistically as long
>as one accepts the conventions.
>
>I also a remember a very fine novella by an Australian woman which is
>profoundly concerned with feminine experience but switches in its last
>chapter to a male narrator. I felt no disjunction in this but rather a
>simultaneous sense of aesthetic pleasure and awareness of the heightened
>dramatisation of the questions the book asks via this tactic.
>
>Best
>
>Dave
>
>
>
>David Bircumshaw
>
>Leicester, England
>
>Home Page
>
>A Chide's Alphabet
>
>Painting Without Numbers
>
>http://homepage.ntlworld.com/david.bircumshaw/index.htm
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Alison Croggon" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 12:13 PM
>Subject: Re: Skivvy
>
>
>Hurriedly - I remember years ago reading Madame Bovary, and being
>knocked out by it; a wonderful portrayal of a woman being stifled,
>from childhood on, of enormous sensitivity.  I was always puzzled by
>the  division of sex in writing - that is, when I first fell over it
>as a young woman - it never occurred to me that I couldn't imagine
>being a man.  What's an imagination for?  It's the barriers of
>imagination we ought to argue against -
>
>Best
>
>Alison
>
>
>
> >It has been said that a male could not have written the poem,
> >now I'd mention here Anne Carson's 'Autobiography of Red', a sequence by a
> >woman which deals with male homo-erotic desire and does so to my mind with
> >considerable success. Likewise a male writer can speak in the female voice,
> >if the writer has the imaginative capacity.
> >
> >_you_ said that Dave - I disagreed with you.  And I think you have
>clarified
> >the elision here - being able to write in the voice of a man or a woman is
> >one thing.  Of course it is possible, though there are dangers and
>pitfalls.
> >The most glaring being the easy assumption that the poet knows all about
>the
> >other and can write from their position without ever having to question
> >his/her own.
> >
> >But the assertiont that the resulting text could have been written by a man
> >or a woman only makes sense if you completely erase gender from
> >consciousness.  Even DB  cant do that I think!
> >
> >I have been following the discussions on gender through the whirlwind of
> >this first week back at work - like others I am very grateful to Alison,
> >Jill and Rebecca for articulating some thoughts that I am very much in
> >agreement with.  I particularly liked your comments about sub/dom in the
>CAD
> >Jill!
> >
> >Liz
> >x
>
>--
>
>
>
>Alison Croggon
>Home page
>http://www.users.bigpond.com/acroggon/
>
>Masthead Online
>http://au.geocities.com/masthead_2/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager