Tom, many thanks for the comment. I wasn't watching the distinction
between sense and affect so the different perspective you have was most
useful (although once you said it things clicked into place...
sensibility is an old research problem I dropped and it appears may have
unconsciously picked up again???) It looks more like a collision then a
carefully worked out thought experiment, I should add. I am also new to
reading Silvan Tomkins so am looking at ways to read him.
best wishes, Chris Jones.
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 15:19, tombell wrote:
> sounds like an interesting project Chris, but the problem as i see it is
> that feelings (as distinct from affects and emotions) which is better
> explored qualitaively (there is a 'science' of qualitaive research as much
> as there is one of quantative research) in the tacit or lived or
> phenomenological dimension?
>
> tom bellTry to like something
> __
> |ry
> tO
> |
> Li
> ke
> something and the anger
> will GO
>
|