JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for OCC-HEALTH Archives


OCC-HEALTH Archives

OCC-HEALTH Archives


OCC-HEALTH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

OCC-HEALTH Home

OCC-HEALTH Home

OCC-HEALTH  2003

OCC-HEALTH 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Latex and Clearance of Agency staff.

From:

Karen Swann <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Occupational Health mailing list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:35:42 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (92 lines)

Our personnel dept send copies of Locum HEP B blood test results to us and we advise them whether or not they are able to perform EPP - we don't routinely do any other health clearance for locums

Karen
-----Original Message-----
From: Gallagher Deirdre (RGZ) [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: 19 August 2003 15:27 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Latex and Clearance of Agency staff.

I think the main issues with Latex gloves have been the Powder, but I
believe the NHS supplies catalogue now only offers powder-free latex gloves,
along with Vinyl and nitrile as alternatives.
How do other NHS Trusts manage to ensure correct screening of agency staff,
especially Locum Dr's who work through agencies.I know some agencies do
employ the services of an OHD to clear their workers, but others assume we
should do it!!Or worse still, agency clerical staff have had training
sometime in the past as to how to decide on what constitutes Hep B
immunity,and they vet the HQ's also and if problems they send on to another
Dr!!!
They are not medically qualified to assess immunisations and certainly not
HQ info...so why do they receive them???
Anybody have any experiences of this?
Deirdre Gallagher
Occupational Health Service Manager
Tel: 0208 302 2678 ext:4543



-----Original Message-----
From: Christine Bouckley [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 02:56
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Latex


Thanks Chris,
I have been aware of these issues, and do also have concerns over
alternatives not always being the best option! We currently operate with low
protein and powder free gloves and seem to have few problems given the
number of staff using latex gloves and other heathcare appliances..we offer
alternatives to those who report problems, but more often than not it boils
down to the need for good skin care rather than to the gloves. I dont think
we will be rushing into a total latex glove ban. I cannot justify the
'change over' well enough ayway at the moment!
christine

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Packham [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 19 August 2003 14:48
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Latex


I would caution against attempting to go latex free altogether and
particularly against replacing natural rubber latex with vinyl. The thin,
single use vinyl gloves do not provide the same level of biological
protection as does natural rubber latex. They puncture easily. Thus by
changing to vinyl you could be putting the users at increased risk of
infection. This raises some interesting legal aspects! You must also
consider disposal of vinyl gloves. They should NOT be incinerated, as this
releases vinyl monomer and dioxins, extremely hazardous chemicals.

In fact, many studies have shown that low free protein, unpowdered natural
rubber latex gloves offer optimum biological protection and do not present a
significant risk of latex sensitisation. You might also be interested to
know that in Germany (where a very comprehensive review was carried out by
Dr. Angelika Heese - Allergien gege Latexhandschuhe, ISBN 3-609-62850-2)
there is now a regulatory requirement for all natural rubber latex gloves to
be unpowdered (Technische Regeln fur Gefahrstoffe, TRGS540).

In fact, several recent studies indicate that the most common cause of skin
problems from latex gloves was irritant contact dermatitis, followed by a
type IV reaction to the chemicals in the latex glove. The type I, latex
allergy, came in third place.

Of course, if you do have someone who is extremely latex sensitive, then you
will have to go to something such as nitrile or polychloroprene (Neoprene).
Bear in mind, however, that (a) these are more expensive and (b) they may
also contain the sentising chemicals for the type IV reaction.

If anyone wants more on this please feel free to contact me. I have a mass
of information, papers etc. and will willingly discuss latex/latex policies.

Chris Packham

EnviroDerm Services
Solutions in skin management
For information on skin management, technical bulletins and information
about our support services visit our website (www.enviroderm.co.uk)
For immediate help e-mail us at [log in to unmask] or phone on +44 1386
832 311

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager