JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for OCC-HEALTH Archives


OCC-HEALTH Archives

OCC-HEALTH Archives


OCC-HEALTH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

OCC-HEALTH Home

OCC-HEALTH Home

OCC-HEALTH  2003

OCC-HEALTH 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: nurse numbers in OH

From:

Greta Thornbory <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Greta Thornbory <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 9 Feb 2003 13:08:19 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (152 lines)

I understand what you are saying and agree there should be a record of
'specialist nursing practice' but not all OH qualifications - or for that
matter other qualifications are 'nursing' - or medicine. I have a
professional colleague - a nurse who has a PhD in physiology and was
teaching in-flight nursing - so she did a course in Aviation medicine (and
was one of the 60% who passed the exam) and was refused the qualification
because she was not a medical doctor. I have 2 qualifications that are not
recognised by the NMC because they are not nursing qualifications. If an
employer wants to know I have my PGCEA and the MSc he/she can see my
certificates and verify these with the relevant university. The
qualifications indicate that I have the knowledge - but not the skills, and
competency is about knowledge, skills and understanding. Although I must say
that the PGCEA did require supervised practice.

Nurses are required to keep a record of their CPD in a portfolio and to
reflect on what they have learnt and how it applies to practice. They may
have to produce a profile for audit by the NMC. They are required to
complete a Notification of Practice form that tells the NMC where they are
working and in what capacity. They are encouraged today to undertake
specialist (nursing) practice qualifications. Some nurses working in OH
choose not to do 'nursing' OH specialist practice courses but to do courses
such as NEBOSH etc. - therefore they cannot be recorded by the NMC. Some
universities and colleges have explored 'joint' qualification and where this
has happened qualifications are recordable - e.g. if they follow the nursing
pathway for the MSC from Robens they have both a recordable qualification
and depending on other modules they may also have qualifications with other
bodies. I am sure the GMC does not record NEBOSH either - but some OH nurses
think that NEBOSH is a more suitable course for practice as an OH
nurse..................it will depend on ones philosophy and definition of
nursing!!

Now there's a whole new debate.....

Greta


----- Original Message -----
From: Kate Venables
<[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>; <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: nurse numbers in OH


Why?  In the context of medical specialisation, to facilitate revalidation
by the GMC.  The continuing updating and audit of specialist practice is as
important for nurses as for doctors.

Again, in the context of doctors, to aid planning.  Although OH has been
left out of the planning loop by DoH, it is helpful to have up-to-date
figures.  Ditto for nurses as for doctors.

B/w - K


>>> Greta Thornbory <[log in to unmask]> 08/02/03 00:07:25 >>>
May I ask why there needs to be a database of OH nurses with a specialist OH
qualification especially as there is absolutely no need to have one to
practice in OH? The NMC holds recognised 'nursing' qualifications - not
recognised OH qualifications and, as I understand it, an MSc in Medical
Science is not a nursing qualification it is an OH qualification. If the NMC
were to record/recognise all qualifications that nurses may hold it would be
rather a large unwieldy database with 644K nurses registered. For example -
I have a PGCEA which is not recognised by the NMC because I am not trained
as a 'nurse tutor', but a teacher of adults - this means I can teach all
sorts of adults and not just nurses - but it is not a nursing qualification
and as far as I can see is much more useful in OH!!!

I believe that what is far more important is that the NMC use the data they
collect from 'Notification of Practice' forms to inform about how many
people are practicing in a given field of practice - this would enable those
involved with post registration nurse education to develop relevant courses.

Greta


----- Original Message -----
From: diane romano woodward <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: nurse numbers in OH


> Here, here , Lucy
> (But then I would say that because we have the same qualification)
> The AOHNP gives each of its members a networking directory of all the
other
> members contact details and their area of special interest or expertise.
> Probably of more use than just which qualifications they have...
>
> Diane
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Adrian & Lucy" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:41 AM
> Subject: Fw: nurse numbers in OH
>
>
> > > Indeed.  The problem in OH is that there are a substantial number of
> > > excellent post-reg / post-grad courses that are not yet recognised by
> the
> > > NMC.  The M.Sc. at the Institute of Occupational Health being one of
> them!
> > > Disappointed as I am that it has not been recognised, it does save me
a
> > > registration fee on the OH register that I have thus far not needed
for
> > > employment.   I do always notify the NMC that this is the area I
> practice
> > > in.  Maybe the SOHA and AOHNP could provide a database like the SOM
> does?
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Greta Thornbory" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 10:19 PM
> > > Subject: Re: nurse numbers in OH
> > >
> > >
> > > > Unfortunately the NMC does not give a breakdown of the specialist
> > > > practitioner qualification - unless I missed it! I have just checked
> > their
> > > > stats and at March 2002 only 3185 OH nurses had recorded their
> > > qualification
> > > > and 8,917 specialist practitioners - however, there is no breakdown
of
> > > > specialist practitioners!
> > > >
> > > > Lets hope the NMC make more use of the information they get from the
> > > > Notification of Practice Forms to give a clearer picture in future
of
> > who
> > > > works where!
> > > >
> > > > Greta
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Kate Venables
> > > > <[log in to unmask]>
> > > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 7:49 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: nurse numbers in OH
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > And, of those, how many are entered as specialist practitioners in
the
> > NMC
> > > > register?  - K
> > >
> >

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager