JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for OCC-HEALTH Archives


OCC-HEALTH Archives

OCC-HEALTH Archives


OCC-HEALTH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

OCC-HEALTH Home

OCC-HEALTH Home

OCC-HEALTH  2003

OCC-HEALTH 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: NURSING REGISTRATION

From:

Lindsey Hall <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Lindsey Hall <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 5 Feb 2003 18:30:36 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (74 lines)

It seems you have 2 constraints.
1) The abilities, knowledge and experience of those applying.
2) The number of those applying.

The important thing is to draw up a specification of the person you are
looking for.  Even though this is a training post you presumably have some
idea of the type of person you are looking for, their current communication
skills, commitment etc, you know the stuff, and you can match your
applicants to this.

If you have plenty of applicants - and the implication is that you haven't
(with 3000 nurses working in OH in the UK, we probably all have that t
shirt) - then you can set your sites quite high.  If your applicants are
few, you can always be a little less discerning about CVs and interview
those you might not be too keen on.  Sometimes you will be surprised.  If
not,  you can always choose not to appoint if your applicants do not match
up to your spec.

Hope this helps

Lindsey Hall
National OH Manager
Environment Agency








----- Original Message -----
From: "Bolderstone, Sarah" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:16 AM
Subject: NURSING REGISTRATION


Has anybody any thoughts regarding the following, please?

We have advertised for an Occupational Health  Nurse Training Post, and the
interviews are on 10/2/03.  We have just received an application from an
internal applicant,  who is applying as a redeployee.

She qualified in 1968, and she states that she has not practised in a
clinical situation since 1975.  She says that she has a PIN number, but that
her registration has lapsed.  (We have applied to the NMC to check her
registration, but we have to register, and wait for a pass word).

She states that she has met the PREP requirements "Considerably in excess of
the minimum of 35 hours over the last 3 years, and that she fulfils the
requirements of practice of the NMC with over 1,000 hours in social care
during the past 5 years"  On questioning, this has involved adults with
learning disabilities, providing personal care, and developing care plans.
She states that she has been told by the NMC that her level of practice will
allow her to re-register, once she has done a 5 day return to practice
course, presumably, run by the NHS.

We are obviously going to verify this with the NMC, but due to the tight
time frame, does anybody know if the Return to Nursing course is only valid
for those wishing to return to work in the NHS, and, also, would this
experience in social care be sufficient evidence of practice to re-register?

Regards, Sarah.
Occupational Health  Nursing Officer
Occupational Health Unit
Room 9
Elizabeth II Court
The Castle
Winchester
So23 8UJ
01962 847689
Fax: 01962 845002

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager