JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for OCC-HEALTH Archives


OCC-HEALTH Archives

OCC-HEALTH Archives


OCC-HEALTH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

OCC-HEALTH Home

OCC-HEALTH Home

OCC-HEALTH  2003

OCC-HEALTH 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Pre-employment questionnaires

From:

Amanda Dowson <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Occupational Health mailing list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 10 Jul 2003 09:48:00 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (133 lines)

You are quite right John and I am sure that everyone will agree that there
is more than one shade of grey here.

What I think the general concerns refer to are those who are not enlighted
and are not aware that they are not enlightened and this refers not just to
some nurses but to some HR / Medical Practitioners and in some cases
qualified OH nurses that continue practising on a historical model rather
than an evidence based model. I am sure that if I look through my career
there are times when this applies to me.

Amanda

-----Original Message-----
From: John Caffrey [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 10 July 2003 09:31
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Pre-employment questionnaires


Hi

As an RGN who at present is without the OH qualification (but that will be
resolved by this time next year) but plenty of experience and courses etc,
I have found some elements of the current discussion a bit disconcerting.
Yes I agree that the knowledge base is essential and that is why I study
as hard as I do and why that will never stop.  But to lump all RGN's into
one group and describe them as having tendencies to do "this and that"
quite frankly wrong.  We would not be justified in doing that with our
clients, then why do we do it with our colleagues?

When I examine PEQ I do not look for reasons to fail them, but with the
DDA in mind, I do look for ways to overcome any problems that may become
evident.  Suitable adjustments are then suggested as necessary.

Yours

John Caffrey
Occupational Health Advisor


-----Original Message-----
From: Christmas Giuliana [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 10 July 2003 08:54
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Pre-employment questionnaires


Hi,

I agree that someone with OH knowledge should review PEQs. OHAs have the
advantage not only of being aware of the problems that can lead to ill
health in the workplace, they generally have the opportunity to review the
health information and assess it in the context of the specific role and
working environment. In supervising RGNs examining PEQs, I have come across
a tendency for them to think of worst case scenarios as to why the job
can't
be done by the individual rather than looking at what can be done, with or
without reasonable adjustments. This is particularly true where the
applicant has a history of mental health problems.

Regards,

Giuliana

-----Original Message-----
From: diane romano woodward [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 09 July 2003 19:50
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Pre-employment questionnaires


Kennie and everyone-
Occupational health is a speciality in both medicine and nursing. Those of
us who have specialist training (diploma/degree/Masters) have encountered a
body of knowledge
which others will not , in the relationship in work and health- how work
may
affect health and how a persons pre-existing health problems may impact on
and be accommodated at work.
Relying on an RGN (who is not under the direct supervision an OH qualified
practitioner) makes about as much sense as expecting the same RGN to be
practising safely and competently in the speciality of cancer or children's
health or any other speciality. RGN training is a basis on which to expand
knowledge. If you rely on unsupervised RGN to make such decisions you may
get some wrong (and costly)decisions.
I would make the same assertion in using a "medical practitioner" without
an
OH qualification. As a very minimum a GP with OH diploma and that only for
the most straightforward of cases.
Am I preaching to the converted? Sorry..
Best wishes,
Diane
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kennie Adeoye" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: Pre-employment questionnaires


> We do not have an OH dept, we at the moment using an independent medical
advisor, but I do believe HR can open all PEQ and make referrals where
necessary (possibly under the guidance of a medical practitioner)and where
in doubt they refer.
> Is it necessary to refer all PEQ? Scenario:  With a past medical history
of a fracture and is seeking to work as an adm. support staff, do they
require a sound judgment on their fitness for that post?. Is the advise
here
to refer everyone who complete the PEQ? I will appreciate some advice.
>
> We have two Registered nurses and although they are not  Occ.health
qualified, the main issues here is are they competent to make that
decision.
>
> Kennie
>
____________________________________________________________________________
_____
> Please note that the contents of this e-mail, including any attachments
thereto, may contain information which is confidential or privileged, and
which is solely for the use of the recipient named above.  If you are not
the intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
> If you receive this e-mail by mistake, please contact the originator
immediately.
> Northampton Borough Council, The Guildhall, Northampton, United Kingdom,
NN1 1DE
> +44 (0)1604 837837
> www.northampton.gov.uk
>
____________________________________________________________________________
_____
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager