ok; I'm sure it was an oversight - but the sentiments seem pretty happy.
Anyway, thanks for the new paper's address which I suppose was the original point of the message.
I'll echo Roger - congrats. to Fraser.
regards
Philip Buckle
----- Original Message -----
From: "Musson, Roger MW" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tuesday, December 2, 2003 5:03 pm
Subject: Re: 'An Operational Framework for Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Red uction' - new Benfield Hazard Research Centre working paper
> Circulating personal emails to several hundred total strangers could
> possibly be construed as a "natural hazard". In that it is a
> hazard that
> people seem to fall prey to quite naturally.
>
> Regards to Fraser whoever he is - I hope he doesn't blow away too many
> people. (I wondered whether it was perhaps some Hurricane Fraser
> that was
> the subject of discussion).
>
> Roger Musson
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony Eastwood [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 02 December 2003 16:26
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 'An Operational Framework for Mainstreaming Disaster
> Risk Red
> uction' - new Benfield Hazard Research Centre working paper
>
>
>
> Are we now including personal emails on this distribution list?
> Regards
> Tony
>
>
>
> *********************************************************************
> This e-mail message, and any files transmitted with it, are
> confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee. If
> this message was not addressed to you, you have received it in error
> and any copying, distribution or other use of any part of it is
> strictly prohibited. Any views or opinions presented are solely those
> of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of the British
> Geological Survey. The security of e-mail communication cannot be
> guaranteed and the BGS accepts no liability for claims arising as a
> result of the use of this medium to transmit messages from or to the
> BGS. . http://www.bgs.ac.uk
> *********************************************************************
>
>
|