Dear Celine
Thank you so much for all the trouble that you've taken with this. I'm sure
many people will find the resume you've given below really helpful.
I've also replied to you off line.
Best wishes
Jo
At 22:19 18/11/03 -0500, you wrote:
>Dear Jo,
>
>I found the article you need. ( 8 pages). Here is, in a few words, the
>content:
>Recognising that the intrapsychic reorganisation during pregnancy and birth
>can be difficult, the authors want to develop the subject of traumatic
>nevrose which is not very well known and not diagnosed. The impact of the
>traumatic nevrose is handicaping the mother and constitute a major risk for
>ulterior pregnancy and birth.
>
>The autors develop a definition and history of the traumatic nevrose. The
>article is a reflexion based on ten observations of clinical cases. After
>gathering 5 analogies between cases, they elaborate a theory. They make
>the hypothese that the birth was traumatic because it involved an
>unconscious psychic representation. The occasion of the first birth produced
>a hole in the repression and that hole remains latent until the next
>preganncy. Nightmares will come through that hole.
>
>
>
>Give me a sign if you want a fax copy of the article.
>
>
>
>take care, Céline
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jo Alexander" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 5:18 AM
>Subject: Perspect Psychiatriques- article wanted
>
>
>> Dear Colleagues
>> I would very much value sight of the following:
>> Bydlowski M, Raoul-Duval A 1978 Un avatar psychique meconnu de la
>> puerperalite: la nervose traumatic post-obstetricale. Perspect
>> Psychiatriques 4: 321-328
>> Neither Oxford University not the British Library have been able to find a
>> source in the UK and I don't think I can justify the expense of extending
>> the search abroad. This seems to be a much referenced article in the PTSD
>> literature.
>> If anyone could let me have sight of this article (and even better a
>> translation also- but failing that I'm very prepared to battle with the
>> original!) I'd be very grateful.
>> Many thanks
>> Jo
>> PS Jane- where would we be without the list- thanks.
>>
>
>
|