JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives


MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives


MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Home

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Home

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH  2003

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Antenatal CTGs

From:

ddevane <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health research." <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 4 Oct 2003 21:20:04 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (213 lines)

Dear Belinda

A colleague, Joan Lalor, and I have briefly looked at the area of use
and interpretation of preterm CTGs and below is part of a draft paper,
which might be of use.  Additionally, I include other references that
may help.

The evidence consistently demonstrates known differences in fetal
behavioural states in response to cardiovascular and central nervous
system influences associated with gestational age.(Cibis, 1996)  The
correlation, for example, between fetal movements, fetal heart
accelerations and fetal wellbeing seen in the non-stress test (NST)
later in pregnancy is not readily recognisable in fetuses of less than
32 weeks gestation.(Natale, Nasello, & Turliuk, 1984)  In addition,
gestational age influences fetal responses to stressful
conditions(Cibils, 1977) and as NST parameters vary with fetal maturity,
ominous fetal heart patterns associated with fetal distress in the term
infant may not have the same predictive value in immature
fetuses(Westgren, Holmqvist, Svenningsen, & Ingemarsson, 1982).

Such important known differences in gestational age and dependent fetal
responses have important clinical implications.(Park, Hwang, Cha, Park,
& Koh, 2001 {Cibis, 1996 #159)

Cibils, L. A. (1977). Clinical significance of fetal heart rate patterns
during labor. IV. Agonal patterns. American Journal of Obstetrics &
Gynecology, 129(8), 833-844.

Cibis, L. A. (1996). On Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring. American Journal
of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 174(4), 1382-1389.

Natale, R., Nasello, C., & Turliuk, R. (1984). The relationship between
movements and accelerations in fetal heart rate at 24 to 32 weeks'
gestation. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 148, 591-595.

Park, M. I., Hwang, J. H., Cha, K. J., Park, Y. S., & Koh, S. K. (2001).
Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate parameters by gestational age.
International Journal of Gynaecology & Obstetrics., 74(2), 157-164.

Westgren, M., Holmqvist, P., Svenningsen, N. W., & Ingemarsson, I.
(1982). Intrapartum fetal monitoring in preterm deliveries: prospective
study. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 60, 99-106.

OTHER REFS

Aladjem, S., Vuolo, K., Pazos, R., & Lueck, J. (1981). Antepartum fetal
testing: evaluation and redefinition of criteria for clinical
interpretation. Semin Perinatol, 5, 145-154.

Bowes, W. A., Gabbe, S. G., & Bowes, C. (1980). Fetal heart rate
monitoring in premature infants weighing 1500 grams or less. American
Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 137, 791-795.

Burrus, D. R., O'Shea, T. M., Jr., Veille, J. C., & Mueller-Heubach, E.
(1994). The predictive value of intrapartum fetal heart rate
abnormalities in the extremely premature infant. American Journal of
Obstetrics & Gynecology., 171(4), 1128-1132.

Castillo, R. A., Devon, L. D., Arthur, M., Searle, N., Metheny, W. P., &
Ruedrich, D. A. (1989). The preterm nonstress test: Effects of
gestational age and length of study. 160, 172-175.

Dawes, G. S., Moulden, M., & Redman, C. W. (1996). Improvements in
computerized fetal heart rate analysis antepartum. Journal of Perinatal
Medicine., 24(1), 25-36.

Druzin, M. L., Fox, A., Kogut, E., & Carlson, C. (1985). The
relationship of the nonstress test to gestational age. American Journal
of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 156, 386-389.

Druzin, M. L., Hutson, J. M., & Edersheim, T. G. (1986). Relationship of
baseline fetal heart rate to gestational age and fetal sex. American
Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 154(5), 1102-1103.

Eden, R. D., Seifert, L. S., Frese-Gallo, J., Bartasius, V., & Spellacy,
W. N. (1987). Effect of gestational age on baseline fetal heart rate
during the third trimester of pregnancy. Journal of Reproductive
Medicine., 32(4), 285-286.

Gagnon, R., Campbell, K., Hunse, C., & Patrick, J. (1987). Patterns of
human fetal heart rate accelerations from 26 weeks to term. 157,
743-748.

Ibarra-Polo, A. A., Guiloff, E., & Gomez-Rogers, C. (1972). Fetal heart
rate throughout pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology,
113, 814-818.

Killien, M. G., & Shy, K. (1989). A randomized trial of electronic fetal
monitoring in preterm labor: mothers' views. Birth, 16, 7-12.

Koyanagi, T., Nakahara, H., Hori, E., Hara, K., & Nakano, H. (1988). A
mathematical model for analyzing beat-to-beat difference in the human
fetal heart rate during gestation and labor. International Journal of
Bio-Medical Computing., 22(1), 29-37.

Low, J. A., Galbraith, R. S., Muir, D. W., Killen, H. L., Pater, E. A.,
& Karchmar, E. J. (l992). Mortality and morbidity after intrapartum
asphyxia in the preterm fetus. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 80, 57-56l.

Low, J. A., Panagitopoulos, C., & Derrick, E. J. (1995). Newborn
complications after intrapartum asphyxia with metabolic acidosis in the
pre term fetus. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 172,
805-810.

Natale, R., Nasello, C., & Turliuk, R. (1984). The relationship between
movements and accelerations in fetal heart rate at 24 to 32 weeks'
gestation. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 148, 591-595.

Navot, D., Yaffe, H., & Sadovsky, E. (1984). The ratio of fetal heart
rate accelerations to fetal movements according to gestational age. 149,
92-94.

Nicolaides, K. H., Sadovsky, G., & Visser, G. H. (1989). Heart rate
patterns in normoxemic, hypoxemic, and anemic second-trimester fetuses.
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology., 160(5 Pt 1), 1034-1037.

Pillai, M., & James, D. (1990). The development of fetal heart rate
patterns during normal pregnancy. Obstetrics & Gynecology., 76(5 Pt 1),
812-816.

Prietsch, V., Knoepke, U., & Obladen, M. (1994). Continuous monitoring
of heart rate variability in preterm infants. Early Human Development.,
37(2), 117-131.

Snijders, R. J., McLaren, R., & Nicolaides, K. H. (1990).
Computer-assisted analysis of fetal heart rate patterns at 20-41 weeks'
gestation. Fetal Diagnosis & Therapy., 5(2), 79-83.

Sorokin, Y., Dierker, U., Pillay, S. K., & et al. (1982). The
association between fetal heart rate patterns and fetal movements in
pregnancies between 20 and 30 weeks' gestation. American Journal of
Obstetrics & Gynecology, 143, 243-249.

Visser, G. H., Sadovsky, G., & Nicolaides, K. H. (1990). Antepartum
heart rate patterns in small-for-gestational-age third-trimester
fetuses: correlations with blood gas values obtained at cordocentesis.
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology., 162(3), 698-703.

Wheeler, T., & Murrills, A. (1978). Patterns of fetal heart rate during
normal pregnancy. British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 85,
18-27.



Declan

Declan Devane,
Doctoral Student / Midwifery Research Assistant,
School of Nursing and Midwifery Studies,
University of Dublin Trinity College,
Trinity Centre for Health Sciences Education,
St. James's Hospital,
Dublin 8.
Tel: 087 659 6923
Email: [log in to unmask]

*******************************************
Please note that electronic mail to,
from or within Trinity College may be
the subject of a request under the
Freedom of Information Act
*******************************************


-----Original Message-----
From: A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health
research. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Gloria
Lankshear
Sent: 03 October 2003 11:11
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Antenatal CTGs


Hi Belinda,

I am a researcher looking at decision support systems in the medical
field and have just come across a system that Oxford Instruments have
designed. They are just sending me a draft of a booklet they are
producing about the system which from what I can deduce helps to
interpret antenatal CTGs. So it might be of interest to you. It is based
on Dawes/Redman work, and uses computer stored data to help in
interpretation. That is all I know about the system but I thought it
might be of interest to you.

Best wishes, Gloria

-----Original Message-----
From: Belinda Cox [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 02 October 2003 19:22
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Antenatal CTGs


Apologies for cross posting.

I'm interested to know the criteria other units use for 'diagnosing'
CTGs done in the antenatal period. To explain what I mean, the NICE EFM
guideline defines what is 'normal', 'suspicious' and 'pathological', but
this guideline only relates to term pregnancies when the woman is in
labour.

How do we 'diagnose' what is normal or otherwise in a CTG done, for
example, at 34 weeks?  Do other units use similar criteria limits on
things such as baseline, variability etc,  for these CTGS, or do you
have different limits?

Does anyone know of any evidence to back up NICE's or an individual
unit's criteria for non-labouring CTGs?

Many thanks,

Belinda

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager