JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIS-PROFESSION Archives


LIS-PROFESSION Archives

LIS-PROFESSION Archives


LIS-PROFESSION@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIS-PROFESSION Home

LIS-PROFESSION Home

LIS-PROFESSION  2003

LIS-PROFESSION 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Low pay again

From:

Prof Bruce Royan <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Chartered Library and Information Professionals <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 7 Feb 2003 16:15:18 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (280 lines)

I'm sure that E Dantes' remark was not meant to be a personal jibe at
Elspeth Hyams. If it had been, it would have been inaccurate as well as
offensive.

Its great that so many people are motivated enough to contribute to this
list, but I hope we can keep the discussions on a rational and civilised
level
:-)

Bruce

-----Original Message-----
From: Chartered Library and Information Professionals
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of e dantes
Sent: 07 February 2003 15:29
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Low pay again


I am thoroughly disgusted that Mike Morris' letter was not published. Fear
of redundancy often keeps people in low paid work. Conveniently enough,
redundancy was not an issue that you had to face after the LA/IIS merger.






>From: Elspeth Hyams <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: Chartered Library and Information Professionals
><[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Low pay again
>Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 16:12:54 -0000
>
>Update has a policy of publishing letters that make new points.  Mike's
>points have been reiterated on a number of occasions, and, what is more, by
>Mike himself and especially on these lists.  We have covered the low pay
>debate before, though more extensively in Update's predecessor (the Library
>and Association Record) than Update itself. However, since numerically
>speaking the combined membership of CILIP is, substantially, the same, the
>editor and her team judged that the point of view had already been aired.
>
>Many people use the remarkable opportunities that exist within traditional
>library and information work as a platform to something else.  That can
>benefit not only them, but  the institutions or posts that they vacate,
>because it brings in new blood, while the individuals moving on take their
>expertise elsewhere to the benefit of the organisation that receives them.
>
>There are many people who have used remarkably rich experience within the
>educational library sector as stepping stones to new opportunities.  Some
>of them we have profiled in Update.
>
>Perhaps the key element to financial 'success' in this profession is a
>willingness to move jobs and to identify promising opportunities.   But
>that is true in any profession.  If an individual finds a job that they
>love and want to stay in , then presumably, they are staying put, because
>the job satisfaction is worth more than the money and conditions elsewhere.
>  A number of people have already said that job satisfaction in library and
>information work is high.
>
>Would anyone care to comment?
>
>Elspeth Hyams
>
>
> > ----------
> > From:         Charles Oppenheim
> > Reply To:     Chartered Library and Information Professionals
> > Sent:         Friday, January 31, 2003 3:38 pm
> > To:   [log in to unmask]
> > Subject:      Re: Low pay again
> >
> > Mike said " Well, one person in Oxford told me low pay didn't matter
>because all our husbands are dons."  Presumably Mike was talking to a
>woman, and hence the quote.
> >
> > I wonder why CILIP Update declined to publish the original  letter,
>which seemed to me to make a valid point.  I'd prefer it if CILIP declined
>to accept advertisements for professional posts paid at below, say £19k.
> >
> > Charles
> >
> > Professor Charles Oppenheim
> > Department of Information Science
> > Loughborough University
> > Loughborough
> > Leics LE11 3TU
> > 01509-223065
> > (fax) 01509-223053
> >
> >       ----- Original Message -----
> >       From: Maria Gunn
> >       To: [log in to unmask]
> >       Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 3:18 PM
> >       Subject: Re: Low pay again
> >
> >       I want to know how someone called Mike has a husband?
> >
> >       I'm not in Librarianship for the money.  I always have believed
>that the most important thing is to be happy in your job, I mean we do
>spend a large proportion of our lives at work, so we might as well enjoy
>it!
> >
> >       Maria
> >
> >       At 14:30 31/01/2003 +0000, you wrote:
> >
> >
> >               I do love these fast moving discussions.
> >
> >               Dan
> >
> >
> >                       -----Original Message-----
> >
> >                       From: Mike Morris
>[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> >
> >                       Sent: 31 January 2003 14:30
> >
> >                       To: [log in to unmask]
> >
> >                       Subject: Re: Low pay again
> >
> >
> >                       In what way?
> >
> >                       ----- Original Message -----
> >
> >                       From: Finney, Emma P
> >
> >                       To: [log in to unmask]
> >
> >                       Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 2:28 PM
> >
> >                       Subject: Re: Low pay again
> >
> >
> >                       Yes, drive does pay the mortgage.
> >
> >
> >
> >                       -----Original Message-----
> >
> >                       From: Mike Morris
>[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> >
> >                       Sent: 31 January 2003 14:23
> >
> >                       To: [log in to unmask]
> >
> >                       Subject: Re: Low pay again
> >
> >
> >                       Well, one person in Oxford told me low pay didn't
>matter because all our husbands are dons.
> >
> >                       Does "drive" pay the mortgage, then?
> >
> >                       M
> >
> >                       ----- Original Message -----
> >
> >                       From: Finney, Emma P
> >
> >                       To: [log in to unmask]
> >
> >                       Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 2:06 PM>
> >
> >                       Subject: Re: Low pay again
> >
> >
> >                       Do you think people decide to become librarians
>because of the pay ?
> >
> >
> >
> >                       Recently qualified with drive
> >
> >                       Em
> >
> >                       -----Original Message-----
> >
> >                       From: Mike Morris
>[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> >
> >                       Sent: 31 January 2003 12:06
> >
> >                       To: [log in to unmask]
> >
> >                       Subject: Fw: Low pay again
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >                       ----- Original Message -----
> >
> >                       From: Mike Morris
> >
> >                       To: [log in to unmask]
> >
> >                       Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:35 AM
> >
> >                       Subject: Low pay again
> >
> >
> >                       Since Update doesn't want to publish this I
>thought I'd share it with the list instead.
> >
> >
> >
> >                       ----- Original Message -----
> >
> >                       From: Mike Morris
> >
> >                       To: [log in to unmask]
> >
> >                       Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 9:19 AM
> >
> >                       Subject: Letter for publication: Leaders article
> >
> >
> >                       I sometimes wonder if people like Sheila Corrall
>live on the same planet as me. Her article in L & I Appointments 6:1
>invokes the usual sub-literate committees (what is "isNTO", and why is it
>spelt like that?) and so forth agonizing over the seemingly intractable
>problem of attracting "leaders" in LIS. In the pages following her article
>we see job ads offering £22k for a Manager in Uxbridge, £19k in
>Gloucestershire and *graduate* assistant posts at £18k.
> >
> >                       Might there be an obvious reason here why anyone
>with an ounce of drive would not choose librarianship?
> >
> >
> >
> >                       [letter ends]
> >
> >                       Incidentally I hear Polly Toynbee recently
>suggested £20k was the median wage across the UK and anyone living below
>that was effectively living near the poverty line.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >       Maria Gunn
> >       Readers Services Librarian
> >       Advocates Library
> >       Parliament House
> >       Edinburgh
> >       EH1 1RF
> >
> >       Tel:    0131 260 5683
> >       Fax:    0131 260 5663
> >       Email:  [log in to unmask]
> >
> >
>**********************************************************************
> >       Visit our website at http://www.advocates.org.uk
> >
> >       This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> >       intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
>they
> >       are addressed. If you have received this email in error please
>notify
> >       the system manager. [log in to unmask]
> >
> >       This footnote also confirms that this email message has been
> >       swept for the presence of computer viruses.
> >
>**********************************************************************
> >
> >
> >


_________________________________________________________________
Use MSN Messenger to send music and pics to your friends
http://messenger.msn.co.uk

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager