Hi.
I can't remember which, if any, version of SIENA/X is shipped with the FSL
inside MEDx, but either way the current version of FSL (3.1) contains
several improvements in SIENA/X over previous versions, so you should use
that.
Your default usage looks correct, yes.
Thanks, Steve.
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Marenco, Stefano (NIH/NIMH) wrote:
> Just a clarification on the use of sienax.
>
>
>
> I have analyze format images.
>
> For each subject I type:
>
>
>
> sienax subjname(root, without specifying .hdr or .img) -r
>
>
>
> Is this sufficient? Or do I have to specify the segmentation options? I see
> no message indicating the progress of the program
>
>
>
> I thought fsl could be used from medx. How is this done? I think medx has
> some fsl routines already implemented but I doubt they have the latest
> versions of things....
>
>
>
> Stefano Marenco, MD
>
> Senior Staff Fellow
>
> NIMH/CBDB
>
> 10 Center Drive, Room 4S235
>
> Bethesda, MD 20892
>
> tel (301) 435-8964
>
> fax (301) 451-4269
>
>
>
>
Stephen M. Smith MA DPhil CEng MIEE
Associate Director, FMRIB and Analysis Research Coordinator
Oxford University Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain
John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
+44 (0) 1865 222726 (fax 222717)
[log in to unmask] http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve
|