Hi,
It worked fine for my test yesterday.
Sounds like it could be a problem with the matrix files.
If the transformations are too big then you don't see any output.
Oh, and I haven't tested it with 2D data - is that what you are using?
Cheers,
Mark
Paul Smeets wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> I'm afraid I was a bit premature... I ran the improved applyxfm4D on a
> small 20 volume timeseries. The output was an empty file of the right
> dimensions, except for the 11th volume (which looked fine). I tried both
> the image used for obtaining the MAT-files and the input image itself as
> the refvolume. Both are valid, as the refvolume is only used for
> obtaining size and FOV infomation, right?
> Did anyone else happen to test/use applyxfm4D?
>
> Regards,
>
> Paul Smeets
> Image Sciences Institute
> University Medical Centre Utrecht
>
>
|