John wrote (in part); "What Steven (moi) is arguing for is far from an
ethical and responsible treatment
of the patents and their impacts on humans and the environment. His primary
thesis is that there is already an adequate assessment of the risk, and the
rest is pure speculation of amateurs."
When did I say that or even suggest it? John are you even reading my posts
or just assuming what I'm going to say?
Steven
_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
|