I agree! Inquiring minds would like to know how URAC accreditation for
Kaiser connects to WHO. :-) Also, re. the 45 sites accredited so far, my
personal thought is that the financial cost of accreditation may be a
barrier, however I have no idea how many sites have accreditation in
progress or how many sites fail accreditation. That information might make
the accreditation numbers more meaningful.
Patricia Anderson, [log in to unmask]
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Ahmad Risk wrote:
> Bob
>
> I presume you meant "strong case". I am interested to know in what way.
>
> Also interesting to note that only 45 websites have been accredited so far.
>
> Risk
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For developers/evaluators of computerised info for patients/public.
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Bob Pyke Jr.
> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 12:28 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Kaiser's Web Site Gets Accredited
>
>
>
> Fyi,
> Thought this might be of interest?
> http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/html/news/NewsStory.cfm?DID=10591
> I think this may well make a string case for the WHO .health inititive
>
>
> Bob Pyke Jr.
>
> [log in to unmask]
> Co administrator Telehealth List Serve and roving editor at large.
> http://www.telehealth.net/interviews/pykebio.html
> Editor, John Hopkins Pediatric Point of Interest
> http://derm.med.jhmi.edu/poi/
> Media Reviews Editor
> http://www.bcsnsg.org.uk/itin/index.html
>
>
|