JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Archives


BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Archives

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Archives


BRITISH-IRISH-POETS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Home

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Home

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS  2003

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Fwd: U.S. opposition to a war on Iraq

From:

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 18 Jan 2003 20:38:56 +1000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (293 lines)

>Date: 18 Jan 2003 07:02:31 -0000
>From: "Wes Boyd, MoveOn.org" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: "Alison Croggon" <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: U.S. opposition to a war on Iraq
>
>Dear MoveOn supporters worldwide,
>
>Yesterday, we launched a nationwide TV ad campaign in the U.S.,
>which has received a great deal of national and local media
>attention.  Our key message is "Let the Inspections Work."
>
>You can see the ad itself on our home page at
>
>    http://www.moveon.org
>
>I've also attached some news coverage of the ad below, which
>describes the ad in some detail.
>
>This ad is part of our campaign to communicate the depth and
>breadth of opposition to an Iraq War, in the U.S.  Although
>the polls show very thin support for war, until now the media
>has not widely reported this.
>
>Our biggest surprise is how many members of the media around
>the world are interested in this story.  Apparently, the
>American public is widely seen as moving lock-step behind the
>most extremist members of the Bush administration.  Journalists
>around the world seem surprised by the strength of opposition
>in the U.S.
>
>Please help us spread the word.  If you know any members of
>the press in your country who should know about our efforts,
>please pass this note on to them.
>
>We've posted our press release regarding the ad, still images,
>audio, and video suitable for broadcast in our press room at:
>
>    http://www.moveon.org/pressroom.html
>
>As a follow-on, this coming Tuesday, more than 7,000 MoveOn
>members will be visiting their senators and members of congress
>in more than 400 local offices across the nation, asking them
>to "Let the Inspections Work."  Opposition to war in Iraq is
>broad and deep in the U.S. and worldwide.  Let's let everyone
>know.
>
>Thank you.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>-Wes Boyd
>  President, MoveOn.org
>  January 17th, 2002
>
>P.S. I've also attached our recent alert to our U.S. audience
>with more details on the campaign below.  Our "Let the Inspection
>Work" petition has more than 300,000 signatories world-wide.
>If you'd like to add your name and comment, go to:
>
>    http://www.moveon.org/winwithoutwar
>
>_______________
>
>Dear MoveOn member,
>
>Today's the day.  Today we're launching a hard-hitting TV ad across
>the nation to underline our key message: "Let the Inspections Work."
>
>In December, we asked members to contribute $27,000 for a print
>ad in the New York Times.  Within days, we had more than $400,000
>committed to our ad campaign.  This allowed us to do several print
>ads, including an ad in USA Today.  To follow up, we ran a radio
>ad created by Betsey Binet, one of our members.  But once we saw
>the avalanche of support, we knew it was time to go to TV.
>
>Over the holidays, we worked on the spot you'll see today.  Our
>goal is to underline the risk of war and we've created a piece
>intended to provoke discussion and controversy.  Without further
>ado, you can view the ad on the main page of our website at:
>
>    http://www.moveon.org
>
>The ad is airing on TV stations in Washington, DC, Los Angeles,
>San Francisco, Philadelphia, Chicago, Dallas, Miami, Boston,
>Minneapolis, Phoenix, Cleveland, Portland and Seattle.  The ad
>buy is largely on cable networks, and will show heavily on public
>interest shows on channels such as CNN and MSNBC for the next week.
>At 10am today in each of these media markets, MoveOn volunteers
>will be running press conferences for the local media.
>
>The press has already shown a great deal of interest in this
>story.  Dan Rather broke the story last night, and Eli will be
>appearing on Good Morning America this morning.  I've attached
>below an Associated Press story that's just hit the wire.
>
>The big story that's gathering steam is just how mainstream and
>broad the opposition to war is, as highlighted today in a Boston
>Globe article I've also excerpted below.  That's exactly our intent
>with this ad.  And just to drive the point home, more than 7,000
>MoveOn members will be visiting more than 500 congressional offices
>across the county next Tuesday.
>
>Please stay tuned.  And thanks everyone,
>
>- The MoveOn Team
>   Carrie, Eli, Joan, Peter, Randall, Wes and Zack
>   January 16th, 2002
>
>P.S.  By the way, for the congressional meetings this coming
>Tuesday we asked for your help to get another 30,000 signatures
>and hit the 200,000 mark.  In 24 hours, you've given us three
>times what we asked for -- we've gotten another 90,000, putting
>us well over a quarter-million.  You don't just hit our goals,
>you shatter them.  Thanks.
>_______________
>
>Excerpt from AP article
>
>ANTI-WAR GROUP REVIVES "DAISY" AD CAMPAIGN
>January 15, 2003
>
>By IAN STEWART
>Associated Press Writer
>
>Revisiting one of the most effective television commercials in
>the annals of U.S. politics, a grassroots anti-war group has
>produced a remake of the "Daisy" ad, warning that a war against
>Iraq could spark nuclear Armageddon.
>
>The provocative 30-second commercial - released to the media
>Wednesday and appearing in 12 major U.S. cities on Thursday
>at a cost of $400,000, was prepared with the help of thousands
>of donations to the Internet-based group MoveOn.org.
>
>The original Daisy ad aired only once, during the 1964
>presidential race. Produced by the campaign of incumbent
>Lyndon B. Johnson, it depicted a 6-year-old girl plucking petals
>from a daisy - along with a missile launch countdown and then a
>nuclear mushroom cloud. The suggestion was that if elected
>president, Republican Barry Goldwater might lead the United
>States to a nuclear war with the Soviet Union. Goldwater lost
>by a wide margin.
>
>The 2003 version follows the same format, with an added montage
>of scenes of military escalation: burning oil wells, tanks in
>the battlefield, wounded soldiers, chaotic protests in a foreign
>city and an ambulance racing through U.S. streets. Then, a similar
>mushroom cloud, and the screen goes to black, with a dire warning:
>"War with Iraq. Maybe it will end quickly. Maybe not. Maybe it
>will spread. Maybe extremists will take over countries with
>nuclear weapons. Maybe the unthinkable."
>
>Then, another "10... 9... 8...," countdown, and a final message:
>"Maybe that's why the overwhelming majority of Americans say to
>President Bush: let the inspections work."
>
>MoveOn.org's leaders hope the ad will enliven the debate on
>the specter of war - and persuade Americans to oppose a
>military solution in Iraq.
>
>"We're playing with matches in a tinderbox," Eli Pariser,
>MoveOn.org's international campaign director said. "We wanted
>to run an ad that would highlight that very real possibility
>and help encourage a national discussion about the consequences
>of war."
>________________
>
>Excerpts from today's Boston Globe
>
>FOES OF A WAR IN IRAQ SPREAD THEIR MESSAGE
>January 16, 2003
>
>By Robert Schlesinger, Globe Staff
>
>WASHINGTON - The ad starts with a little girl pulling petals off
>a daisy and ends with a mushroom cloud - a startling image
>underscoring an appeal for peace. In an updated version of an
>infamous 1964 political spot, modern-day activists are trying
>to urge mainstream Americans to join the movement against
>war with Iraq.
>
>The 30-second television spot, which is scheduled to start running
>today in 13 cities including Boston, is illustrative of a preemptive
>peace movement that has been organizing against a war that hasn't
>started. The movement's leaders are using 21st-century tactics to
>spread their message beyond the traditional ranks of the antiwar
>movement.
>
>"Our members don't really consider themselves activists," said Eli
>Pariser, international campaigns director for MoveOn.org, the group
>that funded and produced the ad. "It's the first time they've been
>involved in political issues. So getting out in the street for them
>is a scary thought, but making contributions and helping pay for
>an ad is something they're only too willing to do."
>
>To produce and air the ad, MoveOn.org raised more than $400,000
>over the Internet from more than 14,000 members between Dec. 5
>and Dec. 7, according to the group, which came into existence
>in 1998 to advocate against impeaching then-president Bill Clinton.
>The group raised more than $26,000 from 1,000 donors in Massachusetts.
>
>...
>
>"On Saturday, you will see many, many people in Washington, D.C.,
>and some of them will be our members,'' said Pariser. ''But what's
>exciting about this is we can get people who are housewives in
>Arkansas or plumbers in Ohio also involved in the same political
>push. I don't think it's a change in tactics necessarily,
>[so much as] adding new tactics that haven't been available in
>the past to reach more mainstream audiences."
>
>The television ad is calculated to get this movement noticed by
>mainstream America. Starting with the girl and the daisy, the
>images shift to what peace activists say could result from a war
>in Iraq: burning oil wells, wounded soldiers, angry crowds.
>
>"War with Iraq. Maybe it will end quickly. Maybe not. Maybe
>extremists will take over countries with nuclear weapons," a
>voice-over says.
>
>The image returns to the little girl before flashing to a nuclear
>explosion. The final message in white letters over a black
>background is: "Let the inspections work," referring to what
>the UN weapons inspectors currently assessing Iraq's efforts
>to develop weapons of mass destruction.
>
>The ad mirrors the television spot "Daisy," which then-president
>Lyndon B. Johnson's campaign ran against Republian challenger
>Barry Goldwater, suggesting that Goldwater was too dangerous to
>have control of the US nuclear arsenal. That ad ran only once
>before being pulled, but it has been rerun countless times as
>a classic of negative political advertising.
>
>The new ad may mirror the old in more than just its theme:
>MoveOn.org spent the relatively small sum of $185,000 on air
>time, apparently hoping just a short run would generate media
>attention.
>
>"The 'Daisy' ad was this ad about the danger that we face as a
>country and about the choices we have to make sure the worst
>doesn't happen," Pariser said. "We felt like we're in a very
>similar situation right now. With the prospect of this war
>in Iraq, we are playing with matches in a tinderbox."
>
>MoveOn.org is part of the Win Without War coalition, one of
>several groups trying to organize a peace movement that
>encompasses people who have in the past been slow to join.
>
>David Cortright, the founder and staff coordinator of Win Without
>War, recalled that the group's genesis came during the October
>antiwar protest in Washington. The rally, said Cortright,
>"was all over the map politically and not very appealing to a
>mainstream perspective." At dinner that night, he and a few others
>discussed forming a coalition that would be "more welcoming to
>mainstream constituencies."
>
>"We wanted to project a more mainstream, patriotic message.
>We feel that the number-one concern about this whole policy is
>that it's going to harm our country," Cortright said. "We don't
>go off and start wars, at least that's our tradition."
>
>The Win Without War group, announced last month as a group of
>"patriotic Americans who share the belief that Saddam Hussein
>cannot be allowed to possess weapons of mass destruction" but
>which also opposes a military solution, was the result. The
>coalition includes groups ranging from the National Organization
>of Women to the National Council of Churches.
>
>"It's an attempt to recognize that it's not just the liberal
>left or the theological left or the political left that is
>organizing," said Dr. Bob Edgar, a former House Democrat from
>Pennsylvania who is now the general secretary for the National
>Council on Churches. "It's just average, ordinary, common people
>who don't normally get excited about issues of war and peace,
>but on this issue they believe that the administration has not
>made its case."
>________________
>
>This is a message from MoveOn.org. To remove yourself from this list,
>please visit our subscription management page at:
>http://moveon.org/s?i=978-673038-0qNTHM1DxjM94vY3L9tGdA

--



Alison Croggon
Home page
http://www.users.bigpond.com/acroggon/

Masthead Online
http://au.geocities.com/masthead_2/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager