On Thursday, November 27, 2003, at 01:06 PM, Alasdair Allan wrote:
>> So what is the argument against SST going in as a software item in
>> its own
>> right? I mean, why should SST be treated differently to (say) AST?
>
> We're never going to distribute it outside the project?
That's right -- undistributed and unsupported. Though since part of
the motivation for the whole CVS transition is to cope with the
situation where _everything_ is unsupported, the distinction is
arguably fragile.
In any case, there needs to be some place for autoconf macros.
Hmm, I think /cvs/devsupport would be better than /cvs/support, since
it's probably less misunderstandable by the repository-browsing hordes.
Norman
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Norman Gray http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/
Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow [log in to unmask]
|