On Fri, 23 May 2003, Giaretta, DL (David) wrote:
> I agree that images/spectra ARE part of the result - if that isn't clear
> then I will beef things up.
OK, that's good to hear.
> However what should not happen normally is for the result to be TeraBytes of
> images.
Understood, naturally I meant images small enough to make some sense in a
publication/talk.
But, there is the other side of this coin (away from images as results)
when a cut out image server viewer is used to scroll around the whole sky
(potentially).
> And yes, there are a lot of details hidden at the moment.
Seems generally true of the whole undertaking... I wouldn't want to make
all that lot into a single document, good luck to those who try!
Peter.
|