JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for STARDEV Archives


STARDEV Archives

STARDEV Archives


STARDEV@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

STARDEV Home

STARDEV Home

STARDEV  2003

STARDEV 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: autoastrom in RAL

From:

Norman Gray <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Starlink development <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 28 Aug 2003 19:35:40 +0100

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (140 lines)

Peter,

On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Peter W. Draper wrote:

> On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Norman Gray wrote:
>
> > That's not the point right now -- ASTROM and autoastrom are not in CVS,
> > and build with ./configure;make straight out of the box, and `./mk' and
> > `./mk build' are just shorthands for that.
> >
>
> Hi Norman,
>
> still doesn't build I'm afraid. See the attached file.

OooooKayyyy. This is tricky, and I think I now understand the
generated-files problem much more clearly than I did.

The fundamental problem is this: if a file is touched, or regenerated
with identical content, then although its timestamp is updated, CVS
does _not_ regard it as having changed, so it does _not_ offer to
commit it, thus the timestamp in the _repository_ hasn't changed, and
so the file's time when someone next does an update isn't changed
either.

Thus I've just now made a trivial edit of moggy/configure.ac, and
regenerated moggy/config.h.in, which depends on moggy/configure.ac.
In my working directory, I have

... Aug 28 17:25 config.h.in
... Aug 28 17:24 configure.ac

but in cvs.starlink.ac.uk:/cvs/applications/autoastrom/moggy/,

... Aug 27 17:50 configure.ac,v
... Aug 25 13:58 config.h.in,v

because I haven't committed the configure.ac yet. If, however, I do
`cvs status' on configure.ac and config.h.in, I'm told that configure.ac
is locally modified (true), but that config.h.in is _up-to-date_ (true,
sort of, but unfortunate, for this purpose). Thus if you were to do
an update after I commit this, then your configure.ac and config.h.in
would have the correct contents, but config.h.in would have an earlier
timestamp than configure.ac, making make think that it needs regenerating.
This is the meaning of the apparently innocuous remark in the automake
documentation (well, innocuous to me -- perhaps everyone else appreciated
its significance immediately)[1]:

    If users use cvs update to update their copy, instead of cvs checkout
    to fetch a fresh one, timestamps will be inaccurate. Some rebuild
    rules will be triggered and attempt to run developer tools such as
    autoconf or automake.

So far so straightforward.

This is such a clear problem that one of the auxiliary files that you
get with an automake package is `missing'. When automake and autoconf
are invoked to regenerate files such as config.h.in, or Makefile.in from
Makefile.am, that is done via `missing':

cd . && /bin/sh /loc/pwda/pdraper/cvs/autoastrom/moggy/missing --run aclocal-1.7
/loc/pwda/pdraper/cvs/autoastrom/moggy/missing: line 46: aclocal-1.7: command not found
WARNING: `aclocal-1.7' is missing on your system. You should only need it if
         you modified `acinclude.m4' or `configure.ac'. You might want
         to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. Grab them from
         any GNU archive site.

You don't have aclocal-1.7, so `missing' says you probably don't need it,
and updates the timestamp on the file it thought it had to regenerate
(but didn't, and couldn't). That's ok, and the build can now carry
on as if nothing had happened (is the plan). It does the same with
automake-1.7, but when it thinks that it has to regenerate configure from
configure.ac (not sure why, since configure's newer than configure.ac in
the repository), it attempts to run `autoconf', rather than a specific
autoconf version, and since you _do_ have a version of autoconf available,
it does run it, but barfs on the AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE macro, which is specific
to a recent version of _automake_, and so isn't one of the m4 macros which
your autoconf (which is the same version as mine, I recall) knows about.

In other words, the `missing' mechanism works if you have a recent
version of the autotools or _no_ version, but not, or not completely,
otherwise.

All this did work with me, even though I carefully didn't have the
recent autotools in my path -- only the ancient RH7.3 tools -- because
my generated files were genuinely newer than their sources, and so
missing wasn't invoked. My generated files were newer because I
tested this in a freshly checked out copy of the module, rather than
an updated working copy, and that meant that the timestamps
corresponded with the actual state of the files.

So? What?

(i) Force all of us to use the current versions of the autotools?
    No. Even though I better understand the problems with the check-em-in
    school, the keep-em-out problems still sound worse.

(ii) Revert to old versions?
    I could possibly alter the moggy things so that I wasn't using the
    AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE macro in the configure.ac, so that the result was
    processable by older versions of autotools. But that's daft -- I
    don't know what effect that would have on the configuration, and
    even if it did still work now, there's no guarantee that thing
    would continue to work in future. Also, this isn't really solving
    the general problem, merely evading it in this case. So no, I
    think.

(iii) Make sure we remove system autotools from our paths
    Though it might be a fuss, initially, this might be most reliable.
    They're in /usr/bin, so this would involve deinstalling the autoconf,
    automake and libtool RPMs, and either installing them elsewhere,
    if they're relocatable, or just building and installing them by
    hand in a non-default place (what I've done). If there are _no_
    autotools in the path, then the `missing' script can do its work
    successfully, and this problem disappears.

(iv) Use a post-update script to finagle the timestamps
    This is one of the solutions the automake manual suggests. The
    GCC script they're referring to is, I think, GCC's
    contrib/gcc_update[2]. That particular script is customised for
    that build tree. I think we could get away with a more generic
    one which knew what things depended on what. This feels slightly
    dodgy, though.

I think that (iii) is possibly the best plan, followed by (iv). Any
other suggestions?

See you,

Norman


[1] http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#CVS again
[2] http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/contrib/gcc_update

--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Norman Gray http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/
Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, UK [log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2023
January 2023
December 2022
July 2022
June 2022
April 2022
March 2022
December 2021
October 2021
July 2021
April 2021
January 2021
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
May 2020
November 2019
October 2019
July 2019
June 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
August 2018
July 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
December 2017
October 2017
August 2017
July 2017
May 2017
April 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
2004
April 2003
2003


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager