JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIS-PROFESSION Archives


LIS-PROFESSION Archives

LIS-PROFESSION Archives


LIS-PROFESSION@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIS-PROFESSION Home

LIS-PROFESSION Home

LIS-PROFESSION  2003

LIS-PROFESSION 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Low pay again

From:

Frances Hendrix <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Chartered Library and Information Professionals <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 3 Feb 2003 12:10:23 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (189 lines)

I agree with Mike's first point re pricing low, considered cheap. However
there is a problem with aligning ourselves with nurses, firemen etc, and
that is we have no shroud factor, and society (although would be poorer for
it), could do without us. In fact some c50% do?


-----Original Message-----
From: Chartered Library and Information Professionals
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Mike Morris
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:41 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Low pay again


Some years ago when I was a starving actor, there was a general belief that
you should price shows fairly high if you could, on the grounds that
audiences were suspicious of things which were very cheap. I suspect the
same thing applies to librarians.
What galls me is to see constant reference on the TV news etc to low-paid
nurses, firemen and especially teachers, all militant at the disgrace of
earning more than I do.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Frances Hendrix" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:46 AM
Subject: Re: Low pay again


There seems to be a huge diversity of pay across this sector.

Only today a specialist post in London, with a tiny staff, but a huge
personal spec requirement, is advertised (but to everyone not just
Librarians), at £55k.

The posts and opportunities that Elspeth mentioned are few and far between,
and I believe that it is not necessarily a plus to have a career in
librarianship on your CV, if applying outside the sector. The skills and
experience do not appear to have a high enough value, and the image is not
one that appeals to a lot of sectors. The number of people who have 'broken
out' so to speak are small.Again I am aware of many University Librarians
who would like to get to Assistant Director level, and only a few have, and
a very few have gone from Head of Libraries in a local authority to the
Executive team, and then most often, but with one or two notable exceptions,
in small authorities.

Current discussion about  public libraries, and to some extent a trend, is
to go for 'good managers', and not necessarily librarians., so are we
considered not to be good mangers?. Perhaps there needs to be a root and
branch change in the education of librarians, with more emphasis on
libraries in the 21st Century, with the appropriate managerial, financial,
and marketing skills?

It is perhaps chicken and egg. If we had higher pay would we have a better
image. or if we had a better image would we have higher pay?


-----Original Message-----
From: Chartered Library and Information Professionals
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Katherine Ingham
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 10:54 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Low pay again



Perhaps someone should set up a librarians dating agency...

Seriously, that is a ridiculous attitude, what happens if you want to get
together with a fellow librarian or someone who earns less than you?  It's
not real life.

Re Elspeth's comments about all the wonderful opportunities, that's true,
and great, but not a lot of help for those of us starting out.  I don't mind
that I may not earn enough to join the rich list, but wages need to reflect
the qualifications & experience required.  I currently run a small childcare
library which I got without experience and have been learning on the job all
along, but I decided I ought to get a library qualification to continue in
the sector.  So I've got myself into even more debt to do this but I do
enjoy the work, so that's ok.  BUT it doesn't seem right that many library
jobs advertised that I could apply for won't really give me a significant
rise on what I earn (if at all), which won't help with paying all my student
debt off.  If you want experienced, qualified staff you have to pay them
well!  I also think those year long graduate trainee posts are paid
pitifully.

It seems to be something public sector workers suffer from in general, I
have a friend who is an assistant psychologist who earns less than me but
must work twice as hard.  We need public sector workers & not everyone wants
to be a graduate consultant with a faceless banking organisation.  My ex
(who I obviously should have got to stick with me in order to continue with
my career), graduated at the same time as me & is now a chartered surveyor
who won't take less than 30K in his next job.  Why should surveyors earn so
much more than librarians?

I know eventually I can take up one of those wonderful jobs that isn't
necessarily advertised as information work but I kind of need to live now!
Also I might not want one of those jobs.

Anyway, that's my rant for now, I do love my job & I do want to stay in the
sector but slightly more realistic wages would help us all relax & enjoy
life a little more.  Especially those of us in our 20s who are suffering
from the government's ridiculous policies on student finance.

Katherine Ingham
Learning Resource Administrator
Children's Information Service
9 Leopold Street
Sheffield
S1 2GY

Telephone (0114) 249 6379
Fax (0114) 249 6376
Email [log in to unmask]

Visit our website @ http://www.childrenfirst.org.uk
<http://www.childrenfirst.org.uk>

        -----Original Message-----
From:   Keith O'Sullivan [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent:   Monday, February 03, 2003 10:07 AM
To:     [log in to unmask]
Subject:        FW: Low pay again

        No, this is the sort of suggestion which must be countered. It's
simply not
acceptable for a graduate profession, one that I would assume wants to be
taken seriously, to be predicated on this basis. (Not to say quite demeaning

for a lot of male librarians- I write from personal experience). KMCO.

        -----Original Message-----
From: Sheila Thomas [ mailto:[log in to unmask]
<mailto:[log in to unmask]> ]
Sent: 03 February 2003 09:37
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Low pay again


        > I do love the work, but I
> don't see how I can afford to stay. Is there a nether class of
> librarian in FE?

        I don't think the problem is confined to those working in FE. I've
seen my
salary fall further and further behind over the years, and my standard of
living drop as the cost of living rises.
At a recent meeting in Cambridge of ELIPP it was suggested by one of the
attendees that the secret to surviving on a librarian's salary was to have a

partner who worked in a better-paid profession - this met with agreement
from many directions.
I suppose this is where I am going wrong. I should be concentrating on
finding someone to partially support me instead of looking for that elusive
information-related job with a good salary where the recruiters will
appreciate that my CV loaded with many years of database work really is
worth consideration.
--
Sheila Thomas        [log in to unmask]
Web Manager at TWI
http://www.twi.co.uk <http://www.twi.co.uk>



_____________________________________________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential, and may be legally
privileged.  It is intended only for the person(s) specified in the above
address.  Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorised, and any
disclosure, copying, distribution or other use of this e-mail is prohibited
and may be unlawful.  We will not under any circumstances have any
responsibility or liability arising out of or in connection with any
unauthorised use of this e-mail.  Please inform us if this message has gone
astray before deleting it.

        Please note that all e-mail is monitored.

        When sending e-mails to TWI, please help us by including your name,
company,
and details in your e-mail signature.

        For further information about TWI, please visit http://www.twi.co.uk
<http://www.twi.co.uk>


_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by UUNET delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/
<http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager