Dear Emanuele,
To install RPMs for the LCFG server,
I just used "installpackage-ngserver73" command.
So this command seems to select the latest version to
install RPMs, that is, this command dose not use
lcfgng-server-rpm.h.
Anyway I will check the version of all RPMs.
Best Regards,
[log in to unmask]
From: Emanuele LEONARDI <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: se-cfg.h
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 10:52:11 +0200
> Dear Junichi,
>
> the version for edg-lcfg-seinfo-defaults-s1 listed in the
> lcfgng-server-rpm.h file in the lcg1 CVS repository is
> edg-lcfg-seinfo-defaults-s1-2.0.1-edg1 and corresponds to the analogous
> version listed in the lcfgng-client-component-rpm.h file, i.e.
> edg-lcfg-seinfo-2.0.1-edg1.
>
> As a general recommendation, we would prefer all sites to use exactly
> the same rpm versions as those listed in the lcg1 CVS repository.
>
> In this specific case, though, the EDG SE configuration is still in a
> "work-in-progress" state, so I am pretty sure that most of the SE
> functionalities in the tag we published are either broken or
> ill-configured. If you have good reasons to stay with your current
> version 2.0.2, feel free to do so. Only:
>
> a) make sure that you also update the version in
> lcfgng-client-component-rpm.h
> b) move from the SARoot to the SARoot_alice syntax in your config files
> (you have already done this)
> c) keep in mind that you are misaligned with the other sites when
> checking and comparing problems in the SE configuration area
>
> Hopefully, we will get a more "correct" tag from EDG and the LCG
> certification&test group very soon, and most of the SE rpms will be
> updated.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Emanuele
>
> Junichi Tanaka wrote:
> >
> > Dear Emanuele,
> >
> > From: Emanuele LEONARDI <[log in to unmask]>
> > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 10:00:58 +0200
> > >
> > > Going through the seinfo definitions in
> > > /usr/lib/lcfg/defaults/server/seinfo-1.def on the LCFGng server, I see
> > > that SARoot is defined as a simple value which by default is set to "/".
> > > This is consistent with the way it is used by the object in
> > > /etc/obj/seinfo.
> > >
> > > Please make sure that the rpm edg-lcfg-seinfo-defaults-s1-2.0.1-edg1 is
> > > installed on the LCFGng server and edg-lcfg-seinfo-2.0.1-edg1 is
> > > installed on the SE node.
> >
> > At our LCFGng server:
> > [lcgadmin@dglcfg0 RPMS]$ rpm -qa|grep seinfo
> > edg-lcfg-seinfo-defaults-s1-2.0.2-edg1
> >
> > So 2.0.2 not 2.0.1.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > [log in to unmask]
> >
> > > Junichi Tanaka wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear all,
> > > >
> > > > I have a question about se-cfg.h.
> > > > When I did "mkxprof -v -r -s -S. our-se",
> > > > I met a "SARoot" problem in line 77 of se-cfg.h:
> > > >
> > > > seinfo.SARoot /
> > > >
> > > > I don't understand LCFGng in detail but
> > > > this may not be consitent with the definition of
> > > > "/usr/lib/lcfg/defaults/server/seinfo-1.def".
> > > >
> > > > So I commented out this line and then I added
> > > > seinfo.SARoot_alice /
> > > > seinfo.SARoot_atlas /
> > > > seinfo.SARoot_cms /
> > > > seinfo.SARoot_lhcb /
> > > > seinfo.SARoot_dteam /
> > > > to se-cfg.h.
> > > >
> > > > Is it correct?
|