At the University of Cincinnati, we are just beginning to identify some
possible process and outcome measures already existing for PBL instruction.
We are planning to adopt an option or two in each category that could be used
by various instructors in their teaching.

This is a very good topic, and I think there has not been much done yet on it
in relation to PBL.

Bob Conyne
Univ of Cincinnati Counseling Program
513-556-3344

Stuart Mackay wrote:

> Margaret
> Thanks for your email. I think this would make a very good conference with
> people bringing along the different methods they have tried.
> I used a nominal group technique for a semester long PBL pilot module in
> 2001 along with assessment data compared to 2 previous years (same
> assessments) I have also use the PBL tutor evaluation questionnaire
> published by Dolmans et al 1994.
> This provided a view of the programme but I would be happy to discuss
> techniques in general as I am sure there is a better way of doing this.
>
> what do you think?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Margaret Greenhall" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 10:20 AM
> Subject: PBL course evaluations
>
> > I have had  a request from a  department for examples of end of course
> > questionnaires to look in particular at how PBL has worked.  Does anyone
> > have any that they could send to me please or suggestions on how to
> > evaluate a PBL course?
> > Thank you
> > Margaret
> >
> > Dr Margaret Greenhall
> > Curriculum Development Officer
> > Curriculum Innovation, Teaching and Learning Support Unit
> > University of Manchester
> > Oxford Rd
> > Manchester
> > M13 9PL, UK
> > 0161 275 3399
> > FAX 0161275 2872
> > mailto:[log in to unmask]
> > http://www.intranet.man.ac.uk/rsd/ci/
> >