Are we in danger of losing the list? Why?
One of the nicest things about this list is the absence of drivel. Better by
far that it is used sparingly but for real issues that really bother people,
than degenerate into a glorified chat room with hundres of postings a day,
as has been known to happen, though not in local history.
Isobel
>From: James Cricket <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: "From: Local-History list" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Emails to List
>Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 13:08:30 -0000
>
>Perhaps it's because of the spate of virus e-mails we had about a month ago
>which on the surface appeared to be reflecting our interests. Personally
>I don't open e-mails from senders I don't recognise if there is an
>attachment. Might be a good idea to ban attachments. What do others
>think?
>It would be a great shame to lose the list because of a few idiots out
>there.
>
>Dennis Durrant
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jacqueline Gore
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:45 PM
> Subject: Emails to List
>
>
> Dear Listmembers
>
> I hope you don't mind my sending this email. But I have today (26th)
>received the first email since 2 November. Have I missed anything? Or has
>things been very quiet?
>
> Your help appreciated.
>
> Jackie
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
|