WITHOUT WISHING TO PRE-EMPT ANNOUNCEMENTS AT THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF
THE AACULTY- ADRIAN IS DISPLAYING SIGNS OF PRESCIENCE TO SUCH A DEGREE THAT
HE WOULD HAVE BEEN BURNED AS A WITCH IN A PREVIOUS CENTURY.
PATRICK
-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 31 October 2002 19:42
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: emergency exams
Yes, although when FFAEM began many examiners were finding their feet and
still are! It wouldn't be too difficult expanding the clinical slant of our
exam to, say, 50% and reducing the EBM bit to 25%. I would start by dropping
one of the CTRs, it's pointless doing more than one! I would not object to
keeping 25% management at the moment. There are many new trainees coming
through now, like yourself and Simon, who could "pump-prime" a more clinical
exam in the future (not forgetting some of us older guys who can still turn
a hand in resus every now and then!).
>
Adrian
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************
|