No, it is not. If you read the List posts, you will I think see that
Larry Arnold's post was not a private post.
Judy Evans
Cardiff, Wales (UK)
----- Original Message -----
From: "S.Goode" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: Internet research
> Is this discussion list 'private correspondence'? I thought it was
a public
> space, and therefore info or opinions (appropriately credited) were
public
> property on it. (You can quote me on that one).
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Arnold [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 24 October 2002 6:39 AM
> To:
> Subject: Re: Internet research
>
>
> You have no pernission to quote from any of my emails as they are
private
> correspondence, not a jot may you quote without express permission.
>
> There is a matter of more than law in this, there is respect and
courtesy.
>
> As for web sites, I would regard it as a public service if one makes
a copy
> of a web site one quotes as that is ephemeral and may not be there
for
> future readers of your paper. What you should do is consider making
a print
> copy available to copyright library if the website subsequently goes
down.
> That way propriety is preserved.
>
> Larry
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: The Disability-Research Discussion List
> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Mairian
> > Scott-Hill
> > Sent: 23 October 2002 16:27
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Internet research
> >
> >
> > Can anyone out there provide some answers to the following
questions
> > in relation to Internet research:
> >
> > 1. I'm aware of the current (UK?) guidelines in relation to
seeking
> > permissions to cite extracts from printed works i.e. that you only
> > have to ask for permission to cite from the publisher if a single
> > extract is more than a certain number of words or if a number of
> > extracts from the same text exceed a certain number of words.
> > Otherwise it is sufficient to indicate and
> > reference where the cite came from. What I want to know is
> > whether (a) email
> > archives and (b) chat rooms constitute a single text or multiple
texts?
> >
> > 2. What do list participants feel about the ethical dimensions of
> > 'lurking' for the sole purpose of carrying out research? Is
researcher
> > anonymity sometimes helpful in allowing email discussion to
proceed
> > 'naturally' or can
> > their virtual presence and transparency enhance the research in
> > other ways?
> > Can lurking sometimes amount to surveillance? Does lurking go
against the
> > stated aims of 'emancipatory' disability research in relation to
> > researcher
> > transparency and full participation of disabled people? Does it
> > represent a
> > risk to list participants and/or to disabled people (including
children)?
> > Would the answers be the same for any kind of list?
> >
> >
> >
> > Many thanks
> >
> >
> > Mairian
> >
> > ________________End of message______________________
> >
> > Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List are
now
> > located at:
> >
> > www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
> >
> > You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
> >
>
> ________________End of message______________________
>
> Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List are
now
> located at:
>
> www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
>
> You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
>
> ________________End of message______________________
>
> Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
> are now located at:
>
> www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
>
> You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
>
________________End of message______________________
Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
are now located at:
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
|