For information, see below

B. Thirion
______________________________________________________________


Death Of A Meta Tag
http://searchenginewatch.com/sereport/02/10-meta.html


By Danny Sullivan, Editor
The Search Engine Report, Oct. 1, 2002

A longer, more detailed version of this article is
available to Search Engine Watch members.
   Click here to learn more about becoming a member

Traffick.com's Andrew Goodman wrote recently in an essay about meta
tags, "If somebody would just declare the end of the metatag era, full
stop, it would make it easier on everyone."

I'm happy to oblige, at least in the case of the meta keywords tag. Now
supported by only one major crawler-based search engine -- Inktomi --
the value of adding meta keywords tags to pages seems little worth the
time. In my opinion, the meta keywords tag is dead, dead, dead. And like
Andrew, good riddance, I say!

The Rise & Fall Of The Meta Keywords Tag

For those unaware, the meta keyword tag is a way to insert text into an
HTML page that is not visible when the page is viewed through a browser.
Some search engines have read the content of the tag and associated the
words within it along with the page's regular body copy.

The first major crawler-based search engines to use the meta keywords
tag were Infoseek and AltaVista. It's unclear which one provided support
first, but both were offering it in early 1996. When Inktomi launched in
mid-1996 through the HotBot search engine, it also provided support for
the tag. Lycos did the same in mid-1997, taking support up to four out
of the seven major crawlers at the time (Excite, WebCrawler and Northern
Light did not provide support).

The ascendancy of the tag did not last after 1997. Experience with the
tag has showed it to be a spam magnet. Some web site owners would insert
misleading words about their pages or use excessive repetition of words
in hopes of tricking the crawlers about relevancy. For this reason,
Excite (which also owned WebCrawler) resisted added support. Lycos
quietly dropped its support of the tag in 1998, and newer search engines
such as Google and FAST never added support at all.

After Infoseek (Go.com) closed in 2000, the meta keywords tag was left
with only two major supporters: AltaVista and Inktomi. Now Inktomi
remains the only one, with AltaVista having dropped its support in July,
the company says.

"In the past we have indexed the meta keywords tag but have found that
the high incidence of keyword repetition and spam made it an unreliable
indication of site content and quality. We do continue to look at this
issue, and may re-include them if the perceived quality improves over
time," said Jon Glick, AltaVista's director of internet search.

As for Inktomi, the search engine has no immediate plans to follow
AltaVista's lead:

"The meta keywords value is just one of many factors in our ranking
equation, and we've never given too much weight to it. That said, we
will continue to use it as long as our relevance modeling shows that it
adds value," said Ken Norton, director of product marketing for
Inktomi's web search division.

I'm certainly not crying over the decline of the meta keywords tag. It's
always been a confusing issue for site owners. Should I use commas
between words in the tag or not? How many times can I repeat a word on
the page without getting banned? If I don't list a term in the tag, does
that mean my page won't show up? Those are common questions consistently
raised over the years and represent time wasted worrying about a page
element that a minority of crawlers supported -- and for those that did,
an element that was assigned little if any ranking boost.

Indeed, my advice about the meta keywords tag for ages has been simple.
For those running large web sites or short on time, don't worry about
it. The stress and time involved in trying to craft a tag was not worth
it, in terms of the minor benefit it might bring. It is far more
important for site owners to instead concentrate on creating good title
tags for their pages, a key page element that has consistently shown it
can help with ranking across all major crawlers.

Now I can make my advice about the meta keywords tag even easier. Just
don't use the tag at all! Obviously, if you personally find it or
believe it to be useful, keep doing so. But I suspect it's just a waste
of time, for most people.

A longer, more detailed version of this article is
available to Search Engine Watch members.