Hello all,
There's some intersting interpretation of interactivity levels in the
latest Online Learning e-News mailling from vnulearning.com. It's a bit on
the long side, so I won't forward it all, you can find it in the
vnulearning archive at http://www.vnulearning.com/archive.htm, from the Oct
22 link in the first column (the e-news archive).
In short, they have three different views, the first describes
interactivity levels in terms of possible navigation routes, the second in
terms of the complexity of the information / task contained in the lesson,
the third in terms of the role of the learner, from observation, through
participation to ownership.
I'll come out and state that my sympathy lies with the third interpretation.
Does anyone have any other guidelines for how to record interactivity
level, or any comments on the applicability these interpretations?
Best regards, Phil
--
Phil Barker Learning Technology Advisor
ICBL, School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS
Tel: 0131 451 3278 Fax: 0131 451 3327
Web: http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/~philb/
|