> From [log in to unmask] Thu Sep 26 17:04 MET 2002
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:05:05 +0100
> From: "Cumming, Maewyn - Office of the e-Envoy e-Government -" <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: UB proposals
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> I'm not sure how clear the difference is between Date.submission (Date of
> submission of the resource (e.g. thesis, articles, etc.), Recommended for
> theses and dissertations) and our DC-Gov Date.Acquired. In theory they
> are not the same thing, and both dates could apply to one resource. i.e. a
> resource could be submitted on Monday, but get delayed in cyberspace or sent
> around various parts of an organisation and not be properly 'acquired' until
> the Thursday.
>
> Question is, do we need both of them?
Well...we're not just talking about electronic stuff.
Centuries could have passed between a submission and an aquisition.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rebecca S. Guenther [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 26 September 2002 14:52
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: UB proposals
>
>
> Note that "dateSubmitted" was approved at the last DC-Usage Board meeting
> as a result of a proposal from DC-Libraries:
> http://dublincore.org/usage/decisions/2002/2002-02.submitted.shtml
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> ^^ Rebecca S. Guenther ^^
> ^^ Senior Networking and Standards Specialist ^^
> ^^ Network Development and MARC Standards Office ^^
> ^^ 1st and Independence Ave. SE ^^
> ^^ Library of Congress ^^
> ^^ Washington, DC 20540-4402 ^^
> ^^ (202) 707-5092 (voice) (202) 707-0115 (FAX) ^^
> ^^ [log in to unmask] ^^
> ^^ ^^
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> > Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 09:44:51 +0100
> > From: Mary Tan <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: [UB Proposals: "Access Rights" "Security Classification"
> "Acquired" ]
> >
> > Dear DC users
> >
> > There is a need for these qualifiers.
> > We intend to use "Access Rights" and "Security Classification" for our KM
> > Applications.
> >
> > As for "Acquired" we prefer date "Submitted". This date indicates when
> the
> > resource is contributed. "Submitted" can be used for all digital objects
> > whether they are acquired or created within the organisation. However,
> this
> > is only a temporary status of the resource. The status will change once
> > the resource is approved and published on the Internet. The date will be
> > changed to "Issued". We are looking for a software which is able to update
> > the status automatically.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mary Tan
> > Specialist, Content Management
> > National Library Board
> > Singapore
> >
>
> PLEASE NOTE: THE ABOVE MESSAGE WAS RECEIVED FROM THE INTERNET.
>
> On entering the GSI, this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
> Secure Intranet (GSI) virus scanning service supplied exclusively by Cable &
> Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs.
>
> GSI users see http://www.gsi.gov.uk/main/new2002notices.htm for further
> details. In case of problems, please call your organisational IT helpdesk.
>
> ******************************
> The Cabinet Office's computer systems may be monitored and communications
> carried on them recorded, to secure the effective operation of the system
> and for other lawful purposes.
>
>
|