Hi Mike,
I would say since you have already done most bits and I guess
you are an LCFG expert these days then install 1.2.0 (cvs tag v1_2_0).
The changes in 1.2.1 will only be rpms and not configuration and they
are the easy bit. I do not think your time will be wasted.
I think what is not be recommended is that someone who is at 1.2beta10
bother upgrading to 1.2.0 just to do it again a week later.
I just trashed the 1.1.4 release here which gave me great satisfaction.
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael George [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 10:44 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: testbed 1.2.0 vs 1.2.1
Hi,
We have had a partially configured testbed based on 1.1.4 for some
time at Liverpool and were keen to complete the configuration as soon as
possible. Given the current situation with release 1.2.0 and 1.2.1 has
anyone any advice as what would be best to do? I appreciate that Andy
McNab advised non-partner sites to wait until 1.2.1 due to the number of
RPMs which will be different from 1.2.0 but... seeing as we already have a
functioning LCFG server here which can correctly install machines on our
testbed how much effort would be involved in re-installing once 1.2.1 is
released?
Any advice would be much appreciated. Unless it is a really bad
idea we were planning to install beta3 1.2 so that we can at least check
that we have correctly dealt with the site configuration issues.
Cheers,
Michael.
|