Hi
On Mon 12-Aug-2002 at 03:23:52 +0100, Andy Powell wrote:
>
> Personally, I'd prefer to see us referring to 'refined elements'
> rather than 'element refinements' and always using 'new' naming
> constructs which result in stand-alone names like 'dateAvailable'.
So 'conformsTo' could have been 'relationConformsTo' for consistency
with the new naming approach?
And 'mediator' could have been 'audienceMediator' since it's a refined
element that is a subPropertyOf the audience element?
> I'd also like to see us finding a way of going back and
> retrospectively giving the existing 'refined elements' new-style names
Phew, that's going to be a heck of a task!
Wouldn't it make more sense to use old style names ('accepted' rather
than 'dateAccepted') for the existing 3 namespaces and create a _single_
namespace, eg http://purl.org/dc/2002/ for the new style names?
Chris
--
Chris Croome <[log in to unmask]>
web design http://www.webarchitects.co.uk/
web content management http://mkdoc.com/
everything else http://chris.croome.net/
|