Thanks to all who have replied to my question about winMAX. Susan
Radmiller saw my question on the QSR list and sent me the necessary files
to upgrade.
Holly
>Dear Holly
>
>A forum was launched to support MAXqda on 10 June this year. There are no
>messages in it at present. Why not post one? There's a link form the home
>page: http://www.maxqda.com/
>
>Duncan
>
>--On 06 August 2002 23:49 +0200 Heiko Grunenberg <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>>dear holly,
>>
>>you are never out of look!
>>my tip to you: try to use MAXqda! this is a further and newest version of
>>winmax. and in my oppinion, the max-sellers and devellopers are very
>>cooperative with questions. ask them for a version that runs on your
>>computer or try to use maxqda. it has some interesting new options and
>>tools.
>>
>>sincerally,
>>
>> heiko grunenberg.
>>
>>qual-software <[log in to unmask]> schrieb am 05.08.02 18:37:12:
>>> >
>>> > Hope someone can answer my question:
>>> > I bought winMAX a couple of years ago for a qualitative project that
>>> > has yet to get off the ground, so I haven't really used it yet. In
>>> > anticipation of beginning data collection, I recently flipped through
>>> > my winMAX book and saw that it only works on machines running Windows
>>> > 95, 98, or NT. I will be upgrading from Windows 95 to 2000 in the
>>> > next few weeks, and I wanted to know if upgrading winMAX will allow me
>>> > to run it with Windows 2000. However, I haven't been able to upgrade
>>> > from the winMAX site. I tried to run the upgrade (ur99-3.exe), but it
>>> > seems the passwords were wrong. Is that because the web site is no
>>> > longer being updated? I am interested in MAXqda, but I would still
>>> > like to use winMAX, since I have already bought it. Am I out of luck?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks - Holly
>>
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________________
>>_____ [log in to unmask] - nur eine der witzigsten E-Mail-Adressen der
>>Welt! Interesse? Klicken!
>>http://digitaledienste.web.de/MyAdress/?mc=021105
|