On Fri, 2002-07-26 at 16:43, Alan Lillich wrote:
> on 7/25/02 4:24 PM, Douglas Campbell at [log in to unmask]
> wrote:
>
> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
> > <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
> > xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
> > xmlns:dcq="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
> > <rdf:Description rdf:about="hdl:1727.11/00000089">
> > <dc:title>This top-heavy government; what you have to pay for.
> > [1949].</dc:title>
> > <dcq:medium>
> > <dcq:IMT>image/jpeg</dcq:IMT>
> > </dcq:medium>
> > </rdf:Description>
> > </rdf:RDF>
>
> Your problem here is that the dcq:IMT element gets interpreted as an RDF
> typedNode.
Which, is this case, is correct. dcq:IMT is a Class...
Douglas, please note that (as recently discussed on this list) dcq:IMT
cannot be used with dcq:medium, only dc:format. So correct usage is
actually:
<dc:format>
<dcq:IMT>
<rdf:value>image/jpeg</rdf:value>
</dcq:IMT>
</dc:format>
/Mikael
|