In message <002d01c22d1f$6e720f00$68a91e3e@AdrianFogarty>, Adrian
Fogarty <[log in to unmask]> writes
>OK, I agree with the sentiment Andrew, but this particular website campaign
>does strike me as tacky in the extreme. It might appeal to the average SpR,
>but is more likely to alienate the average middle-aged middle-class
>consultant, precisely the "demographic" you want to influence over the next
>few months (the older consultants are most likely to vote Yes, the younger
>consultants No, but the "middle" ones are "up for grabs"). The substantive
>content is fine, but it's the image that smacks of puerility, and I expect
>your intended readership will feel more comfortable with sobriety on this
>particular issue.
>
>Adrian Fogarty
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:06 PM
>Subject: Re: Fw: Consultant Contract
>
>
>> Try this website - does not work with some browsers yet - sorry.
>>
>> www.vote-no.co.uk
>>
>> Andrew Hobart
>>
I think the website is well constructed and puts the message accross
well. Puerile it is not.
I think you are objecting to the colour scheme.
Perhaps an alternative website for the older generation in large print
(readable with bifocals) and in black and white.
Has appointing my good friend Andres made you feel old? :-)
--
Stephen Hughes Youthful SpR 'Arlow
|